 He was not persuaded that certain terms, labels, and phraseologies considered by some as more enlightened, "current", "acceptable" or politically correct were positive changes or necessarily better and did not surrender to pressures to use such terminology.Wolfensberger wrote and spoke quite a bit about this topic, even beyond the article in which he explains his thinking and rationales (Wolfensberger, 2002) but to little avail, even though many consider his teachings in this area as another of his important contributions to the field.In any case, in documenting his work, as is done here, it is historical revisionism to use language he would not have used.