sentences:  The Supreme Court said that New York's ordinance was too broad because it provided no standards that an administrator could use to determine who ought to receive permits to speak about religious issues.In dissent, Justice Robert Jackson said Kunz had used “fighting words” that were not protected by the First Amendment (see unprotected speech).He also criticized the Court for striking down the permit scheme when it had, in "Feiner v. New York" (1951), allowed local officials the discretion to arrest volatile speakers during their presentations.