sentences:  Essentially, the court ruled that the patent failed to adequately describe the invention in its patent or explain how others could replicate its work.Judge Rader in dissent felt that a lack of a more traditional patent concept, enablement, would be sufficient to invalidate the patent.In Judge Rader's view, the use of traditional tests to determine whether a patent is enabled by its descriptions solved the appellate court's problematic analysis more definitively and predictably.