sentences:  The policy banned any type of language in promotional materials that was against the current national energy conservation goals, which included blocking language that would encourage users to shift to off-peak power, though such language could be included in informational material; the Commission recognized that this was undesirable but believed that it was necessary to achieve "some dampening of unnecessary growth" of electricity use.Central Hudson filed suit against the Commission, stating the new policy violated both their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.The case, heard in trial court, at the New York Supreme Court, and at the New York Court of Appeals, found for the Commission, agreeing that the Commission's interest in conservation goals outweighed the commercial speech rights of Central Hudson.