sentences:  Since the five members of the Court who comprised the majority in "Morrison" have also adopted an expansive reading of the Takings Clause in the area of regulatory takings, one should not automatically assume that the judiciary will continue to defer to Congressional findings in cases involving the constitutionality of Congressional regulation of navigable waterways.It is likely that there will be waterway projects whose effects on interstate commerce will be so attenuated that the Court could declare them to be outside Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce.Section 111 has been described by two federal district courts as having legislatively set aside "Rands" and its predecessors, as having in essence abrogate the doctrine of non-compensation for riparian access found in "Rands", and as having repealed the rule of "Rands".