  
<prompt> Zonal difference in management of childhood fever | Percent | (Sought advice or treatment, Highland epidemic, 82) (Had blood test, Highland epidemic, 38) (Treated with antimalarial, Highland epidemic, 22) (Treated with ACT, Highland epidemic, 21) (Sought advice or treatment, Lake endemic, 65) (Had blood test, Lake endemic, 59) (Treated with antimalarial, Lake endemic, 55) (Treated with ACT, Lake endemic, 52) (Sought advice or treatment, Coast endemic, 73) (Had blood test, Coast endemic, 44) (Treated with antimalarial, Coast endemic, 18) (Treated with ACT, Coast endemic, 17) (Sought advice or treatment, Semi-arid, seasonal, 73) (Had blood test, Semi-arid, seasonal, 23) (Treated with antimalarial, Semi-arid, seasonal, 14) (Treated with ACT, Semi-arid, seasonal, 12) (Sought advice or treatment, Low risk, 71) (Had blood test, Low risk, 26) (Treated with antimalarial, Low risk, 8) (Treated with ACT, Low risk, 6) <response> The results show that more than one-third of children with fever in the Highland epidemic zone received antimalarial treatment, and less than one-third of children in the lake endemic zone received ACT treatment.  