Yn ystod y ddadl Cyfnod 1, cyfeiriwyd at eithrio Diwygiadau Canlyniadol a Diddymiadau o wyneb y Bil. Mewn perthynas â’r gyfraith i oedolion mae gennyf resymau da dros wneud hyn. Bydd aelodau’n cofio’r datganiad a wnaed gan y Gweinidog Iechyd a Gwasanaethau Cymdeithasol ar y pryd ar gyflwyno’r Bil yn nodi nad oedd yn cynnwys diwygiadau’r o’r fath. Mae angen pŵer eang iawn i wneud diwygiadau canlyniadol am nad yw’n bosibl drafftio pob un o’r diwygiadau canlyniadol ar wyneb y Bil. Y rheswm dros hyn yw bod yr amserlen ar gyfer y Bil hwn yn gorgyffwrdd â’r Bil Gofal sy’n mynd trwy Senedd y DU ar hyn o bryd. Dyma’r tro cyntaf ers datganoli i ddau Fil gael eu paratoi'r un pryd yng Nghymru a Lloegr, gan beri newid i’r system gyfan.
During the Stage 1 debate, reference was made to the exclusion of consequential amendments and repeals from the face of the Bill. In relation to the law for adults I have good reasons for doing this. Members will recall the oral statement made by the then Minister for Health and Social Services on the introduction of the Bill setting out that it did not include such amendments. A very broad power to make consequential amendments is required because it is not possible to draft all the consequential amendments on the face of the Bill. This is because the timetable for this Bill overlaps with the Care Bill going through the UK Parliament. This is the first time since devolution that two Bills, in Wales and England, have been prepared at the same time making a whole system change.