Numerous architects are upset about the decision to demolish the red building, which enhanced the beauty of the street alongside a park. A heritage activist is urging authorities to save the building due to its historical importance. Recently, a contractor named Shakil began demolishing parts of the building's roof, stating that he was awarded the job through a tender eight months ago and plans to complete the demolition in four days. When approached for a statement, DAE Director General Md Golam Maruf stated to bdnews24.com that the decision to demolish the building was made by the government. He chose not to provide further details, indicating that the building no longer fell under his department's jurisdiction despite its historical importance in agricultural research. Maruf suggested contacting the Cotton Development Board (CDB), the current owner of the building, for more information. CDB Executive Director Md Farid Uddin initially asked to be called back in an hour due to being in a meeting, but subsequently did not respond to bdnews24.com's attempts to reach him. Taimur Islam, CEO of Urban Study Group in Dhaka City, has spoken out against the recent demolition of buildings, highlighting that over 2,500 unlisted heritage buildings are at risk. He emphasized the importance of preserving these buildings to protect the city's architectural heritage. Taimur stated that the building holds significance due to its historical and architectural importance. He mentioned that a Famine Commission was established after the famine in Odisha during the mid-18th century, and some structures were built in Dhaka's Farmgate area to support agricultural expansion. The building was further developed when Bengal was divided in 1905. Taimur emphasized the architectural value of the building. Taimur expressed that the courts and DC council buildings built during the colonial period are similar to the current situation in Bangladesh, where agriculture is being neglected despite being the most vital sector. He believes that the entire area should have been conserved as it holds significant historical value. The agricultural sector has seen technological advancements over time, with seven to eight buildings that should have been protected according to the UNESCO Convention. Architects hurried to the site when demolition work began, with the Institute of Architects Bangladesh General Secretary Qazi Muhammad Arif advocating for the preservation of the building due to its historical importance. There are numerous buildings like this across the country, and it is the responsibility of the government to protect them. As professionals, we believe that the buildings that can be saved should be saved." Arif mentioned that there are plans to construct a tall office building at Khamarbarhi, but there may be ways to safeguard the old buildings. Now it appears that it is too late. The Vice-President of the institute, Jalal Ahmed, stated to bdnews24.com that he was unaware of any plans for the building. He also mentioned that the demolition work had progressed too far and that the building did not seem to be in such poor condition as to warrant being torn down. Associate Professor Shehzad Zahir of Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology commented that the advancement of Bangladesh's agriculture sector was achieved through scientific research. He explained that the laboratory building was where agricultural research began in Bangladesh, making it a key player in the country's agricultural development. He urged for the demolition to be halted immediately and for steps to be taken to protect and preserve the building, as it dates back to the late colonial period. The attractive shedding devices in front of the windows have connected our local architecture to that of Europe, according to BRAC University's Assistant Professor architect Sajid-Bin-Doza. He also mentioned that the building is well-suited for Bangladesh's tropical climate. Sajid expressed disappointment and concern over the lack of preservation of traditional designs in the building. The speaker suggested that the authorities should have taken photographs of the building before it was damaged so that future generations could see it. However, he noted that it would be expensive to restore the building now that it has been severely damaged by a hammer.