Unemployment is at a low rate, inflation is minimal, and economic growth has been consistent for almost a decade. As a college professor who often assigns letter grades, I would rate the US economy as an A-, but with the potential for a higher grade if economic gains were more evenly distributed. However, it is important to consider that Trump influences economic policy, not the economy itself, so a fair assessment would also evaluate his specific policies. To provide an impartial evaluation, I have examined surveys conducted by the University of Chicago involving around 50 prominent economists from various political backgrounds. Surprisingly, these economists overwhelmingly agree that Trump's policies are harmful. This is why many economists are concerned about his presidency, despite the economy performing well. In terms of trade policy, Trump's protectionist tendencies go against the accepted economic belief that tariffs are detrimental. By imposing tariffs on products like aluminum and steel, Trump's trade policies have harmed the competitiveness of American manufacturers. Economists participating in surveys do not believe that these tariffs will benefit Americans, and they also note that global supply chains have made these tariffs more expensive than in previous times. The United States initiated a trade war with China, leading to China retaliating by increasing tariffs on American goods. Trump caused unnecessary uncertainty by threatening to terminate the North American Free Trade Agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. This threat resulted in a new trade deal that many economists believe will not differ significantly from the previous agreement, and it is uncertain whether Congress will approve it. Criticism of Trump's protectionist tendencies is widespread, evidenced by the negative reaction of financial markets when he referred to himself as "Tariff Man" on Twitter. According to a report from the president's Council of Economic Advisers, his tariffs are projected to hinder economic growth. Even according to Trump's own measure of success, the trade deficit has increased to its highest level in a decade, indicating that his policy has not been effective. In terms of fiscal policy, the idea is that the government should save money in good times so that it can spend more and tax less during economic downturns. Trump's fiscal policy, however, has been a failure as his major accomplishment, a $1.5 trillion tax cut, came at a time when it was not necessary. Due to the unusually high budget deficit in a strong economy, increasing government debt will hinder the ability of fiscal policy to stimulate the economy during the next downturn. Although Trump may argue that the tax cut was intended to promote long-term economic growth rather than provide immediate stimulus, economists believe it will not achieve that goal. Prior to the passing of the bill, almost all experts agreed that the tax cut would not significantly increase the gross domestic product a decade from now. While one expert disagreed and believed it would boost growth, concerns about the fairness of the tax plan remain. The simplification of the tax code may have some benefits, but they are likely outweighed by its regressive nature. Recent data suggests that the anticipated investment boom from the tax cut has not materialized. Despite bipartisan support, Trump's promise of infrastructure spending has not been fulfilled. Monetary policy should be straightforward for a president: appoint competent individuals and allow the Federal Reserve to carry out its duties. President Trump has succeeded in selecting Jerome Powell as Fed chairman, who has been highly rated by economists. Trump's other Fed appointments have also been conventional, resulting in a board of policymakers that Jeb Bush could have chosen if he had been elected president. Trump's interference has negatively affected his rating in this area by making the Federal Reserve's job more complicated. Most developed countries, including the US, typically keep monetary policy insulated from political influence to ensure low and stable inflation. However, Trump has publicly criticized Powell for not lowering interest rates and has even considered firing him. This behavior is counterproductive because it undermines Powell's ability to set rates independently without appearing to give in to Trump's pressure. Trump's actions go against established economic principles. The author argues that the economic policies proposed by President Trump diverge significantly from those typically supported by both Democratic and Republican economists. Despite this, the economy has been performing well. This discrepancy raises the question of whether the economy's success is more a result of luck rather than sound decision-making. Trump may have benefitted from inheriting an economy that had been steadily improving since around 2010, as evidenced by various economic indicators. Even if Trump is not responsible for the current positive economic trajectory, he should be acknowledged for not derailing it. The alternative explanation could be that the president has minimal impact on economic outcomes. A more concerning possibility is that the negative effects of Trump's policies have not yet materialized. The uncertainty caused by the chaotic policy process of his administration may have deterred some investors, although their absence is hard to quantify. Furthermore, Trump's tax cuts without proper funding are leading to a debt that future generations will need to address. By eroding the Federal Reserve's autonomy, he could have reduced its effectiveness in combatting inflation. Additionally, deregulating the financial industry may benefit large banks in the short term but could heighten the risk of future economic downturns. The removal of environmental regulations likely boosted profits for certain companies but also accelerated climate change. Limiting immigration may have initially decreased job competition, but economists fear it could stifle innovation and hinder growth in the long term. Admittedly, there is a chance that Trump's approach is correct and economists are mistaken. As an economist with credentials, I personally do not agree with this, but it appears that Trump also does not trust the opinions of economists. This information was reported in 2019 by the New York Times News Service.