not disputing this, but this is ijma of the jurists post-canonization, right? ijma of companions, which is supposed to have greater weight, seemed to have more active female engagement. for e.g. aishas ra role in early jurisprudence, as attested to in zarkashīs al-ijāba. 1
not disputing this, but this is ijma of the jurists post-canonization, right? ijma of companions, which is supposed to have greater weight, seemed to have more active female engagement. for e.g. aishas ra role in early jurisprudence, as attested to in zarkashīs al-ijāba. 1