it's possible it's a semantic dispute, but also possible there's a hidden assumption to the effect that the meta in metanarrative necessarily hegemony or aspiration to hegemony. i don't see why that must be true.
it's possible it's a semantic dispute, but also possible there's a hidden assumption to the effect that the meta in metanarrative necessarily hegemony or aspiration to hegemony. i don't see why that must be true.