A lot of incriminating information not well presented.

Part 1 of the report presented a great deal of information about Russian interference in US elections. It outlined specific receptivity of this interference by Trump campaign but failed to make clearly understood conclusions. Part 2 was more clearly presented and made a strong case(s) of obstruction. However, the report did not succinctly tie the two parts together to explain the relationship between Russia and Trump. It was difficult to read because of significant levels of redacted information and appeared to end before the investigation finished.

###

