24. 2. 89 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 52/37 (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COMMISSION COMMISSION DECISION of 21 February 1989 ‘ accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of urea originating in Austria, Hungary, Malaysia or Romanisa, confirming the undertakings accepted pursuant to.Council Regulation (EEC) No 3339/87 and terminating the investigations (89/143/EEC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, ' Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No.2423/88 ‘of 11 July 1988 on protection against dumped or subsidized imports from countries not members of the . European Economic Community (")  and in particular Article 10 thereof, Whereas : I. CURRENT -PROCEEDING A. Provisional measures (1) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2623/88 imposed a provisional anti-dumping - duty on imports of urea originating in Austria, Hungary, Malaysia, Romania, the USA or Venezuela (3. That duty was-extended for a period not exceeding two months by Council 4018/88 (3). B. Subsequent procedure - (2) FPollowing the imposition of the. provisional anti-dumping duty, the Community producers and several exporters’ of the product concerned asked () OJ No L 209, 2. 8. 1988, p. 1. () OJ No L 235, 25. 8. 1988, p. 5. () OJ No L 355, 23. 12. 1988, p. 3. Regulation: (EEC) No &) @ for and obtained a hearing and also made known in writing their views on the Regulation imposing the provisional duty. In addition to the investigations which resulted in the determination of the provisional anti-dumping duty, the Commission carried out further investi- gations at the premises of the following Community producers : Belgium Nederlandse Stikstof © Maatschappij  BV. (NSM), Brussels, - France — Compagnie frangaise de 1'azote (Cofaz), Paris,. — Société Chimique de la Grande Paroisse, Paris, Ireland Irish- Fertilizer Industries (IFI), Dublin. C. Dumping (a) Normal value ‘ 1. Austria Normal value was definitively calculated according to the method used for-the provisional calculation of normal value, in other words on the basis of the prices charged during the reference period on the domestic market. by the Austrian exporter, which provided sufficient evidence. The Austrian exporter expressed no objection to the method laid down in recital 10 of Regulation (EEC) No 2623/88 or the results obtained by the Commission.