14. 4. 87 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 102/5 COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1043/87 of 10 April 1987 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of standardized multi- phase electric motors having an output of more than 0,75 kW but not more than 75 kW, originating in Yugoslavia THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2176/84 of 23 July 1984 on protection against dumped or subsi- dized imports from countries not members of the Euro- pean Economic Community ('), and in particular Article 11 thereof, After consultation within the advisory committee as provided for under that Regulation, Whereas : (1) A. Procedure In October 1986 the Groupement des industries de matériel d’équipement électrique et de I'electro- nique industrielle associés (Gimelec), supported by the Zentralverband der Elektrotechnischen Indus- trie (Zvei), the Rotating Electrical Machines Associ- ation (REMA), the Fédération des Entreprises de 'industrie des fabrications métallurgiques, mécani- ques, électriques et de la transformation des mati- eéres plastiques (Fabrimetal) and the Associazione Nazionale Industrie Elettrotecniche ed Elettroniche (ANIE), lodged with the Commission a complaint that imports of certain standardized multi-phase electric motors, originating in Yugoslavia, were being dumped and were causing injury to a Community industry. The complainants represent a large proportion of total Community production of the products in question. The complaint concerning imports from Yugo- slavia was lodged with a view to extending the anti-dumping proceeding previously initiated concerning concerning imports of similar motors originating in Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, the German Democratic Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and the Soviet Union (%). Although this new proceeding concerning Yugoslav electric motors is separate from the review referred to above, it nevertheless deals with the same products. In addition, the reference periods chosen for asses- () OJ No L 201, 30. 7. 1984, p. 1. () OJ No C 305, 26. 11. 1985, p. 2. 3) ) ) (6) sing the situation are practically the same. The Commission, in reaching its preliminary conclu- sions regarding the Yugoslav imports in question, therefore took particular account of the Council’s definitive conclusions concerning injury, causal link and Community interest in the sector in ques- tion, set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 864/87 (3. The complaint included evidence of dumping and of consequent material injury for the Community industry manufacturing the standardized multi- phase electric motor in question. This evidence was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of a proceeding and the Commission therefore announced, by a notice in the Official Journal of the European Communities (%), the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of standardized multi-phase electric motors having an output of more than 0,75 kW but not more than 75 kW, originating in Yugoslavia. The products concerned by the complaint are stan- dardized multi-phase electric motors having an output of more than 0,75 kW but not more than 75 kW, falling within subheading ex 85.01 B 1 b) of the Common Customs Tariff, corresponding to NIMEXE codes ex 85.01-33, ex 85.01-34 and ex 85.01-36. ‘ The Commission officially informed the exporters and importers known to be concerned, the repre- sentatives of the exporting countries, and the complainants of the opening of the proceeding and gave the parties directly concerned the opportunity to make known their views in writing and to request to be heard orally. Most of the Community manufacturers, certain importers, and the Yugoslav exporters known to be concerned — Rade-Koncar, Sever and Elektroko- vina — made known their views in writing, in particular on the question of injury and its causes. The information thus gathered was checked by the Commission where necessary. In order to make a preliminary assessment of dumping and injury, the Commission carried out inspections at the premises of the following com- panies : (®) OJ No L 83, 27. 3. 1987, p. 1. () OJ No C 282, 8. 11. 1986, p. 2.