No L 60/14 Official Journal of the European Communities 9. 3. 90 (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COMMISSION COMMISSION DECISION of 22 February 1990 concerning applications for refund of anti-dumping duties collected on certain imports of light sodium carbonate originating in Bulgaria (Industrial Resinera Valcan, SA)- (Only the Spanish text is authentic) (90/86/EEC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the ‘European Economic Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 of 11 July 1988 on protection against dumped or subsi- dized imports from countries not members of the Euro- pean- Economic Community ("), and in particular -Article 16 thereof; Whereas : A. Procedure . (1)  On 1 February 1963 the Council adopted Regula- tion (EEC) No 273/83 () imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of light sodium carbonate originating in Bulgaria and other non- member countries. The rate: of duty applied. to imports of light sodium carbonate in bulk or bagged originating in- Bulgaria was fixed as follows : : — 14,09 % of the price per tonne net, free at Community frontier, before duty, or — the difference between the price per tonne net, free at Community frontier, before duty, and the. sum -of ECU 113,85, whichever amount is the higher. This duty was increased by ECU-9,50 per tonne net for. imports in bags of ‘a weight of less than 500 kg each. {) OJ No L 209, 2. 8. 1988, p. 1. () O] No L 32, 3. 2. 1983, p. 1. (2)  On 25 August 1987 industrial Resinera Valcan, SA, of Cuenca (Spain) submitted an application of a refund of ‘anti-dumping duties paid on the import, in May 1987, of 1000 tonnes of light sodium carbonate in bags of less than-500 kg originating in Bulgaria. The duties amounted to a total of Ptas. .. (9. (3. It is clear from the original procedure- that prices on the Austrian market had been used as the . reference . prices for determining the normal value (%).-The applicant was not able to obtain the necessary information in that regard: since it did not know-the ‘identity of the Austrian producer, which was not named in Regulation No 273/83. On being contacted by the Commission, the producer sent to the Commission information concerning prices on the Austrian market for the references period of six months preceding the import in question (%). 4  In accordance with the Notice, the applicant asked the ‘Bulgarian exporter for information relating to export prices for the other consignments made by the Bulgarian exporter to the Community during () In the published version of the Decision, some information has hereinafter been omitted, pursuant to the provisions of - Articlé” 21 of Regulation No 17 concerning nen-disclosure of business secrets. () See Regulation (EEC) No 2667/82 (provisional duty), O] No L 283, 6. 10. 1982, p. 9, and Regulation No 273/83, quoted abo-- ve, end of sixth recital. () See Commission notice concerning the reimbursement of an- ti-dumping duties, point I (3) (B) (a), OJ No C 266, 22. 10. 1986, p. 2, hercinafter referrd to as ‘the Notice’.