No L 391/20 Official Journal of the European Communities 31. 12. 92 COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 3886/92 of 23 December 1992 laying down detailed rules for the application of the premium schemes provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 on the common organization of the market in beef and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 1244/82 and (EEC) No 714/89 THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty estabhshmg the European Economic Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 on the common organization of the market in beef and veal (), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2066/92 (3, and in particular Articles 4b (8), 4c (4), 4d (6) and (8), 4e (1) and (5), 4f (4), 4g (5) 4h (2), 4i (4) and 4k (2) thereof, Whereas the premium schemes referred to in Articles 4a to 4h of Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 fall within the field of application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 of 27 November 1992 establishing an integrated adminis- tration and control system for certain Community aid schemes () (hereinafter referred to as ‘integrated system’); whereas, as a result, this Regulation should be restricted to the horizontal regulation of outstanding matters within the framework of the said integrated system ; . Whereas provision should be made for the administrative . document provided for in Article 4b (7) of Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 for the administration of the special premium to be drawn up and issued, in principle, at national level ; whereas, in order to take account of parti- cular administration and control conditions in . the Member States, different forms of administrative docu- ment should be allowed ; whereas in cases where animals are exported from one Member State to another, however, a single administrative trade document uniform for the entire Community must be issued in order to ensure reli- able monitoring ; Whereas the grant of the special premium should be subject to compliance with the provisions on administra- tive documents and animal identification ; whereas the objectives of the regional ceiling and the density factor dictate that the special premium may no longer be applied for in respect of the same age bracket for those animals affected by application of these instruments; whereas, for the purposes in particular of the deseasonali- zation premium, these animals should be deemed to have received the premium ; () OJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 24. () OJ No L 215, 30. 7. 1992, p. 49. () OJ No L 355, 5. 12. 1992, p. 1. Whereas, in view of the experience gained, the periods for granting the special premium at the time of slaughter should be defined as the same as those under the previous system ; whereas, in order to take account of the new element of the two age brackets, it is, however, necessary to make provision for two distinct grant options ; whereas the choice of option A presupposes a stable ‘production structure, in particular as regards the presence of the animals on the holding ; whereas the special characteris- tics of these two options make it necessary and advisable to provide for derogations from some of the provisions applicable under the general scheme; Whereas the special control problems linked to the lodging of application after expiry of the retention period make special precautions necessary such as, in particular, a prior statement of participation, additional requirements as to the contents of applications and the proof to be submitted therewith, as well as special animal registration requirements ; Whereas the conditions for granting the deseasonalization premium must be laid down so as to make it possible for this premium to be fully operational from 1993 onwards in accordance with Article 4c (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 ; Whereas the concept of suckler cow must be defined in accordance with the second indent of Article 4d (8); whereas, in this respect, the same breeds as those under the previous scheme should be taken, with the exception of two breeds which up to now have not been considered to be suckler-cow breeds ; whereas, furthermore, essenti- ally the same administration rules which already applied to suckler cows under the old scheme should continue to be applied, in particular as regards the average milk yield and the additional national premium ; Whereas, with a view to implementing the system of indi- vidual ceilings as introduced by the new Articles of Regu- lation (EEC) No 805/68, the rules governing the determi- nation of those ceilings and their communication to the producers should be specified; whereas, also, certain terms should be defined so as to give effect to the said Articles ;. . : ' Whereas, bearing in mind the regulatinmg effect which the system of individual ceilings will have on the market, provision should be made for premium rights not used by their holder during a specific period to revert to the national reserve ; whereas appropriate measures should <