30. 6. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 167/1 (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 1798/90 of 27 June 1990 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of monosodium glutamate originating in Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan and Thailand and definitively collecting the provisional anti-dumping duty imposed on such imports THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN: COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, 'Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 of 11 July 1988 on protection against dumped or subsi- dized imports from countries' not members of the Euro- pean-Economic Community ('), and in particular Article 12 thereof, ) Having regard to the proposal from the Commission submitted after consultation within the . Advisory Committee as provided for under that Regulation, Whereas : A. Provisional measures () The Commission, by Regulation (EEC) No 547/90 (3 imposed provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of monosodium glutamate (hereinafter referred to as ‘KSG’) originating in Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan and Thailand, and accepted undertakings from all the exporters which . cooperated in the investigation and terminated the. investigation concerning those exporters. B. Subsequent procedure- (2)  Following the imposition of the provisional duty on interested party requested a hearing or made written submissions within the time limit with regard to the findings set out in Regulation (EEC) No 547/90. Only one exporter namely Cheil Sugar Co. Ltd, Seoul, whose undertaking had -been accepted, informed the Commission that its company name had changed to Cheil Foods & Chemicals Inc., Seoul. (3)  After expiry of the time limit, the company Tesco Chemichandel GmbH, Diisseldorf, which- was listed in recital (3) () of Regulation (EEC) No 547/90 amongst ‘importers in the Community’, () OJ No L 209, 2. 8. 1988, p. 1. () OJ No L 56, 3. 3. 1990, p. 23. Q) (O € ™ ® claimed that it should have not been mentioned in_ that Regulation, as it did not import WSG origina- ting in the countries' concerned. C. Dumping No new evidence on dumping has been received since the imposition of the provisional duty and the Commission therefore considers its findings on dumping as set out in Regulation No 547/90 to be definitive. Consequently, the preliminary determinations on dumping are confirmed by the Council. D. Injury As no fresh evidence regarding injury to the Community industry was received, the Council also confirms the conclusions on injury reached in Regulation (EEC) 547/90. - E. Community interest No observations were received from any interested party within the time limit daid down in Article 4 . of Regulation (EEC) No 547/90 and the Commis- sion had no reason to change its conclusions set out in recital 23 of the said Regulation. The Council confirms that it is in the Commu- nity’s interest that action be taken. In these circum- stances, the Community’s interest - calls for the imposition.. of definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of .monosodium glutamate .originating in Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan and Thailand. F. Amount of definitive duty In the light of the above determination, the amounts of the definitive anti-dumping duty should be the same as the amounts of the provisi- onal anti-dumping duty.