L 261/36 Official Journal of the European Union 6.8.2004 COUNCIL DECISION of 29 April 2004 amending the Common Manual (2004/574/CE) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, (3)  As regards Iceland and Norway, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (), which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement (). Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 790/2001 of 24 April 2001 reserving to the Council implementing powers with regard to certain detailed provisions and practical procedures for carrying out border checks and surveillance ('), (4)  This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/ 365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis (°); the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application. Having regard to the initiative of the Italian Republic, Whereas: (5)  This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192[EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take (1) Given the level of harmonisation reached on the criteria for the refusal of entry at the external borders of the Member States, it is desirable to be able to identify the part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis (°); Ireland is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application. reasons for a previous decision to refuse the entry of an alien. It is therefore necessary to use a standard form for refusal of entry, which includes a categorisation of the (6) possible reasons for refusal, and to indicate in the pass- port of the alien concerned the reason(s) for refusal. The Common Manual () should therefore be amended accordingly. The possibilities to appeal against the deci- sion for refusal of entry are provided for in national law. This Decision constitutes an act building on the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it within the meaning of Article 3(1) of the Act of Accession, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: (2 In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on Euro- pean Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision, and is not bound by it or subject to its application. Given that this Decision builds upon the 1 Schengen acquis under the provisions of Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Com- munity, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 5 of the said Protocol, decide, within a period of six months after the Council has adopted this Decision, whether it will implement it in its national law. Article 1 Part II of the Common Manual is hereby amended as follows: . the following sentence shall be added at the end of Section 1.4.1: ‘To that end a standard form for refusal of entry at the border as contained in Annex 16 shall be filled in and handed to the alien concerned.’; () OJL 176, 10.7.1999, p. 36. (% OJL176,10.7.1999, p. 31. () OJ L 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43. () OJ L 64,7.3.2002, p. 20. ™ OJ L 116, 26.4.2001, p. 5. () OJ C 313, 16.12.2002, p. 97. Manual as last amended by Decision 2004/466/EC (O] L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 136).