still understand wikipedia editorial obligations citing view scientific consensus phrasing nowhere appears page author frundakis speaks appears hypothesis etc proper provisory results scientific study please supply support assertion supply supports otherwise assertion genetic studies confirms fact neither personal beliefs professional background proof anything thing counts back one assertions case consistently fail provide opposed providing personal opinions consensus see sources husseini got wrote large part article closely watched highly informed experts period use like remove whatever cannot substantiated academic repeating hysterical innuendo rumours material specific objections zero others raised please review wiki policy get back information asked