consensus agreed earlier ntsb briefings authoritative source rightly need separately quoted party media press refs let alone questionable blog postings online media yeah expect people actually seen ntsb briefings otherwise really reason whatsoever bother reviewing stuff anybody bothered watch ntsb briefings please read transcripts frankly beyond guys tolerating type workflow behavior even perceiving stating attack attack expect people familiar topic contributing honestly goes show weaknesses shortcomings crowd sourced encyclopedia writing proper hierarchy one one seniority stylistic aptitude count factual background yeah kinda disappointing