 There are two central types of metaepistemological anti-realist, those that reject epistemic facts and those that accept epistemic facts but reject that the obtaining of these facts is mind-independent in the way the realist insists. Explicit defenses of anti-realist positions in metaepistemology are few and far between—at least, compared with explicit defense of versions of metaethical anti-realism—and rely typically on rationales drawn from metanormative theory and philosophy of language more so than epistemology.