 Critical disability theory thus responds to the traditional disability studies project by pointing to its limits, including exclusions and framing. Concerns and objects of critique include disability studies’ largely liberal approach (Sleeter 2010), narrow consideration of physical disability, focus on the global North (Meekosha &amp; Shuttleworth 2009: 49) and independent living (2009: 52–53 and Kelly 2010), downplay of pain and suffering (Mollow 2017: 350), and ties to or investment in class elitism (Erevelles &amp; Kafer 2010: 208), neoliberalism (Sleeter 2010), masculinism (Kelly 2010), materialism (Vehmas &amp; Watson 2014), somatophobia (Goodley, Liddiard, &amp; Runswick Cole 2018: 201 and Snyder &amp; Mitchell 2001), and white supremacy (Bell 2006; Erevelles &amp; Kafer 2010: 208; and Moore, Lewis, &amp; Brown 2018 – see Other Internet Resources).