 Finally, even if people’s judgments do change in epistemically inappropriate ways, people might be able to recognize which judgments are especially trustworthy. For instance, only some thought experiments are susceptible to order effects, and it turns out that for these thought experiments, people have lower confidence in their responses (e.g., Wright 2010; Zamzow &amp; Nichols 2009). This suggests (contra D5) that there might be an internal resource—confidence—that can be used to discern which judgments are epistemically unstable.