 In Bosanquet’s metaphysics, there is no rigid line between ‘nature’ or the physical, and ‘mind,’ and it makes no sense to talk of a ‘transcendent,’ as some kind of ‘supernatural’ world (see “The True Conception of Another World”; see also Mander 2017: 242). Bosanquet is clearly opposed to dualism; he sees the mind as “a perfection and cooperation of the adaptations and acquisitions stored in the body” (op. cit., p. xxv) and not a separate thing, independent of the body. Bosanquet’s anti-dualism does not, however, lead to panpsychism—the view that all nature has consciousness. (In this respect he appears to differ from F.H. Bradley.) Still, he argues that nature is complete only through human consciousness. Human consciousness serves, Bosanquet holds, as a “copula” between nature and the Absolute. 