 So, if  Reasons for Preferring Ground Deontic Statuses  is indeed compelling, then there is something uniquely compelling about act-consequentialism. And, in that case, the earnest consequentializer is off and running. But, some—such as Paul Hurley (2018)—deny that it is compelling. But even if he is correct, this poses no problem for either notational consequentializers or pragmatic consequentializers, for neither insists on there being something uniquely compelling about act-consequentialism. So, this would be a worry for only earnest consequentializers.