 Some champions of states of affairs want to resist the Argument from Perception. Husserl (1901: § 28) and Reinach (1911: 341f]) denied that states of affairs can be perceived. They argued that only particulars, birds, bushes etc., can be the direct objects of perception. We say “NN saw that a robin sat on a twig.” But these utterances are supposed to be reports of judgements that depend on perceptions of particulars. Hence, the existence of such reports is supposed to be compatible with the claim that states of affairs can only be the correlates of judgements.