 In contrast to those who see luck egalitarian and relational approaches as competing views, Voorhoeve (2019) argues that each has a compelling basis and may be combined in a complementary way. Social or relational egalitarianism recognizes that there is “reason to be averse to choice-based inequalities that threaten people’s status as equal citizens” while the luck egalitarian approach offers a reasonable interpretation of the vague relational requirement of the principle of equal consideration (Voorhoeve 2019: 154–155).