 Objections to the perdurance account of temporary coincidence focus on more general (alleged) difficulties for perdurantism; on whether the account can generalise to cope with all coincidence problems (see  section 4.2);  and on whether it can explain why we are happy to call the statue but not the lump ‘well-made’ or ‘derivative’. There are also specific objections to the perdurance account of cases of temporary coincidence which involve people (see  section 9  for these). What can endurantists come up with instead?