 Many philosophers will also be interested in Binmore  (1994 1998,  2005a)  (**), which shows that application of game-theoretic analysis can underwrite a Rawlsian conception of justice that does not require recourse to Kantian presuppositions about what rational agents would desire behind a veil of ignorance concerning their identities and social roles. (In addition, Binmore offers excursions into a range of other issues both central and peripheral to both the foundations and the frontiers of game theory; these books are particularly rich on problems that interest philosophers.) Almost everyone will be interested in  Frank (1988)  (**), where evolutionary game theory is used to illuminate basic features of human nature and emotion; though readers of this can find criticism of Frank’s model in  Ross and Dumouchel (2004).