 Eliminativism proposes that there are tensions in the use of the “biodiversity” concept, posing the idea that there is a mismatch between the scientific measures of biodiversity and the normative role it plays in conservation science. This perspective therefore contrasts strongly with the historical “variety” framing (above), where the scientific measure of biodiversity as variety, and its recognised value to humanity, is the source of normativity  claims.[3]  Eliminativists argue that, while it would be hard to remove “biodiversity” from use in conservation, this is necessary to allow for a clearer connection between humanities interests in the environment and conservation practice (also see the section on  eliminating biodiversity in the entry on conservation biology).