 Yet Mari Mikkola (2009) claims that the confusion Haslanger’s terms would create by excluding many commonly defined as women “is unlikely to help in the task of challenging existing social conditions.” For her part, Katharine Jenkins (2016) thinks the definition excludes some trans women. Indeed, she argues it probably includes only those trans women whose gender presentation is respected because they are perceived as possessing bodily features associated with a female’s role in reproduction and hence are perceived as either cisgender or as having undergone medical interventions that have altered some of their bodily features so that they now are understood as the same sort of features cis women possess (400). According to Jenkins, Haslanger’s ameliorative project can be rescued by considering gender in terms not only of class, as Haslanger does in talking about gender, but also as identity, as Haslanger does in talking about race. Here gender and racial identities involve navigating the norms associated with those identities. There are thus two concepts that need to be the focus of an ameliorative inquiry: being classed as a woman and having a female gender identity (415–6). 