 Sometime between roughly 1330 and 1335, the English Benedictine Roger Swyneshed adopted a theory in some respects reminiscent of Bradwardine’s, but with interesting features of its own. Like Bradwardine, Swyneshed held that for a proposition to be true, it is not enough that it “signify as is the case”. But whereas Bradwardine maintained that in addition the proposition must not signify otherwise than is the case (that is, it must signify only as is the case), Swyneshed said that in addition the proposition must not “falsify itself”. Propositions that falsify themselves are said to be those that are “relevant (pertinens) to inferring that they are false”. Thus where Bradwardine amended the account of both signification and consequently of truth, Swyneshed amended only the account of truth. Insolubles do falsify themselves, and so are false for that reason, even though they signify as is the case.