 According to the revised version of object theory with the nuclear-extranuclear distinction (MOT\(^{ne}\), for short), this paradox is avoided in the following way: The property of being blue is a nuclear (constitutive) property, the property of having exactly one property, however, is an extranuclear property. There aren’t any objects that have exactly one property. There are only objects that have exactly one constitutive (nuclear) property. Objects that have only a limited number of constitutive properties may (and necessarily do) have additional extranuclear properties—like the property of having exactly \(n\) constitutive properties or the property of being incomplete. The object called “blue” is \(\iota x\forall F^n(F^n x \equiv B^n \Rightarrow F^n\)), i.e., the object that has the property of being blue as its sole constitutive property. This does not rule out that the object blue may have additional extranuclear properties. Thus, the paradox from incompleteness does not arise in  MOT\(^{ne}\).[32]