However, one might challenge whether the Satisfaction Claim is  adequately explained by an appeal to Self-Monitoring and Krasia.   Suppose an instrumentally incoherent agent knows that she ought to give  up her intention to kill her boss, but instead she comes to intend to  poison the office coffee, which she believes to be a necessary means to  killing her boss.  She clearly violates a requirement of reason and she  clearly violates Krasia, but it still seems that she satisfies some  requirement in coming to intend the means to her immoral end.  The  appeal to Self-Monitoring and Krasia can’t explain our thinking that she  satisfies some requirement in proceeding this way.