 Floridi (2012) extends the theory of strongly semantic information into matters of traditional epistemology. His network theory of account involves an argument for the claim that should strongly semantic information be embedded within a network of questions and answers that account for it correctly, then this is necessary and sufficient for the strongly semantic information to count as knowledge. Floridi (2008) develops a theory of relevant semantic information in order to articulate a theory of epistemic relevance. Here he argues that the nature of relevant semantic information is an additional vindication of the veridicality thesis. In Floridi (2011) he further explores just what it might, or should mean for semantic information to be true. Rather than accept a correspondence, coherence, or pragmatic theory of truth, he develops what he calls a correctness theory of truth for the veridicality thesis, one which connects directly with his network theory of account described above.