 Eyal (2013) offers the most promising response to the leveling down objection in this context, pointing to a number of cases where it is plausible to prefer outcomes that are more equal, even if less equal alternatives are available where some are better off and no one is worse off. Luck egalitarians also soften the force of this objection by adopting pluralist views, arguing that comparative fairness is not the only relevant value (see Voorhoeve 2019; Temkin 2013).