 The idea of people having different reasons may seem odd to some. But we recognize convergence reasoning in various contexts. One concerns market transactions. Suppose \(A\) has apples and \(B\) has bananas. \(A\) wants some bananas, and \(B\) wants some apples. After a trade, both have a mixture and regard themselves as better off. Here \(A\) and \(B\) exchanged for different reasons. And so, the arrangement has a convergence justification. Each has a reason of their own to prefer it. And note that the point stands even if \(A\) and \(B\) find one another’s reasons quite alien. Indeed, they might not even know one another’s reasons. But the arrangement still has a kind of public justification.