 Observe that the first three statements in the syllogism have the form of the analogical syllogism using similarity as discussed above: p, the soul, has S, the property of being eternal, because p, the soul, has H, the property of being unproduced; as d, or space, has H, the property of being unproduced, and d, space, has S, the property of being eternal. However, the argument here adds two more statements: the first spells out the analogy between the subject of the proposition and the example, using the correlative expression as (yathā) … so (tathā) …; the second restates the argument’s proposition.