 There is, of course, more to be said on this topic of explanatory adequacy, including whether the earnest consequentializer can give a plausible explanation for the idea that it’s sometimes wrong to violate an agent-centered constraint even to minimize one’s own violations of that constraint—see, e.g., Brook 1991; Kamm 1996; Lopez et al. 2009; Otsuka 2011; and Portmore forthcoming. Still, the above should give the reader a sense of why non-consequentialists might find act-consequentialist counterpart theories to be explanatorily inadequate and how the earnest consequentializer might reply to such worries.