 Finally, it’s worth noticing that, if successful, the objections considered above only show that there is no principle capable of grounding political obligation over all those over whom states claim authority. But why think that a sound theory of political obligation should appeal to a single principle? Perhaps our best account of political obligation will employ different principles to justify the state’s right to demand our obedience in different areas (Klosko 2005) and over different individuals (Renzo 2012 and 2014). One way of overcoming skepticism about political obligation is to be pluralist about it (J. Wolff 2000; Knowles 2010; Mokrosinska; 2012)