 A QBist is convinced that an agent should take quantum mechanics as a guide for setting her subjective degrees of belief about the outcomes of future measurements. Myrvold (2020a,b) has used results of Pusey, Barrett and Rudolph (2012) and Barrett, Cavalcanti, Lal, and Maroney (2014) to argue that anyone with that conviction should also believe that preparations with which she associates distinct pure quantum states result in ontically distinct states of affairs, a conclusion that QBists reject.