 We might also justify interfering with exploitative transactions on strategic grounds. Suppose that \(A\) enjoys a monopoly position, say, as a potential rescuer of \(B\). If we prohibit \(A\) from charging an exorbitant price for his services, then \(A\) might offer his services for a reasonable price. This argument would not justify interfering in a highly competitive market, for, under such conditions, \(A\) would not and could not offer his services for a better price. But there may be numerous situations in which such strategic arguments can work (Wertheimer 1996).