 Three points should be noted here. First, the so-called “simple” (“human” in “human is a species”) supposition is  omitted.[16]  Second, Heytesbury’s analysis of predicates in terms of the merely confused supposition is nominalist, as opposed to the realist analysis of these examples in terms of standing for an abstract  object.[17]  Third, Heytesbury endorses the Aristotelian sensus compositus-sensus divisus distinction, rather than the terminist framework in cases where that would be  appropriate.[18]