 The prototypical moral transgressions they used in these studies were killing and rape; the non-prototypical transgressions were abortion, pornography, homosexuality, and incest. Though they did not explicitly ask whether anyone was harmed by these behaviors, they used responses to the justification questions to determine whether participants thought that the behaviors were harmful. Not surprisingly, many of the participants who thought that abortion was “not all right” justified their judgment by appealing to the harm done to the unborn child. Many participants also thought that pornography caused harm, and they used this belief to justify their negative evaluation of pornography. The role of these beliefs is similar to the role of Hindu beliefs about the consequences of eating chicken the day after one’s father has died. Participants who have these beliefs see harm, and offer negative assessments about actions that people who don’t share the beliefs find unproblematic.