 Roemer’s account clearly separates the structure of exploitation from the particular content that gives rise to exploitation claims. Different specifications of the withdrawal conditions in (1) yield different accounts of exploitation. For example, a relation that Roemer terms ‘feudal exploitation’ occurs when \(S\) would be better off withdrawing with their own endowments. Historically, feudal serfs were required to perform corvée labour on lords’ lands and/or required to pay rents in exchange for ‘protection’. Under the assumption that such ‘protection’ was not of real value, this arrangement was exploitative. Serfs would be better off withdrawing with their own labour and land and not paying the lords. Having lost the value of this labour or rent, lords would be worse off. Roemer identifies capitalist exploitation as a situation in which \(S\) is allowed to withdraw with their per capita alienable assets and socialist exploitation as a situation in which they withdraw with their per capita alienable and inalienable assets (such as skills and talents). Many other forms of exploitation are possible under the Roemerian structure. For example, \(S\) might be ‘Rawls Exploited’ if they would be better off withdrawing with the basic liberties and primary goods required by Rawls’s two principles of justice.