 An account that clearly distinguishes disrespect and unfairness is Nicholas Vrousalis’s domination-based account of exploitation. For Vrousalis, disrespect involves acting towards another in a way that is not “dialogically endorsable” that is, acting in a way that gives one “reason to feel shame or guilt for putting or allowing a particular form of justification for some putative act on the table of discourse” (2013: 140). Domination is a subset of disrespect that involves “\(A\) getting \(B\) to take [\(A\)’s] power over \(B\) as a reason for \(B\) to perform the power-directed act” (2021: 110). And exploitation is a subset of dominating acts that “obtains when the power-directed act, performed for the power-given reason, is geared towards \(A\)’s enrichment” (2021: 110). Thus, exploitations involve domination and domination disrespect. But crucially, for Vrousalis, unfairness is not a necessary condition for exploitation because fairness “is responsibility constrained equality”, but “exploitation can arise from any material inequality” (2013: 149, emphasis added). For Vrousalis, exploitation is a dividend of domination induced servitude, though not necessarily unfair.