 This leads to a second difference between expressivist and our other four alternatives to classical semantics. The latter are all “global alternatives”, in the sense that they propose non-classical approaches to the semantics of all of a natural language. By contrast, expressivists typically agree that classical semantics (or one of the other non-expressivist alternatives to it discussed in  §§2.2.1–4)  is correct for many parts of language; they just think that special features of some parts of language require expressivist treatment.