 The integrity objection relates to a fairness objection. This objection claims that public justification prioritizes secular over religious reasons, arbitrarily preferring secular citizens. (Perry 1993, Wolterstorff 1997). Note that convergence undermines these objections as it allows appeals to religious reasons. (Eberle 2012). The integrity objection also relates to the Denial of Truth objection (Neal 2009). Neal thinks citizens who abide by public justification cannot appeal to the truth as they see it. Andrew March (2013) provides a taxonomy of religion-based criticisms of public reason. He argues that some restrictions can burden us too much. But other conditions are justified.