 So package-delivery transmissions of the “I am the speaker”, “I am fifty years old”, etc. doxastic states should be problematic, and we shouldn’t expect to see them very often, we shouldn’t expect to see natural language constructions that are in the business of expressing them, and we should expect them to be marked as defective on any occasions where they do take place. Package-delivery transmissions of the “we are in Amsterdam” and “it’s getting hot in here” doxastic states, on the other hand, shouldn’t be (or shouldn’t systematically be) problematic. And so we should (says the restrictionist) be open to the possibility of natural language constructions conventionally expressing them, and we should expect any such constructions to display a distinctive sort of defectiveness in the (not-super-frequent) situations when the speaker and their audience are different in the relevant respect. (Other kinds of self-locating doxastic states that have been suggested as objects of package-delivery communication by recenterers include the “that tastes good to me” state and the “I don’t have evidence that rules out rain” state. See Egan 2007 and 2010—though he doesn’t quite describe things in these terms.)