  Skinner’s vantage point on or special contribution to behaviorism mates the science of behavior with the language of organism/environment interactions.  But we humans don’t just run and mate and walk and eat in this or that environment.  We think, classify, analyze, imagine, and theorize. In addition to our outer behavior, we have highly complex inner lives, wherein we are active, often imaginatively, in our heads, all the while often remaining as stuck as posts, as still as stones. Call our inner life ‘behavior’ if one wants, but this piece of linguistic stipulation does not mean that the probability or occurrence of inner events is shaped by the same environmental contingencies as overt behavior or bodily movements.  It does not mean that understanding a sentence or composing an entry for this encyclopedia consist of the same general modes of discriminatory responses as learning how to move one’s body in pursuit of a food source.  How the Inner Representational World of mind maps into the Country of Behaviorism remains the “ism’s” still incompletely charted territory. 