 At the very least, it would seem that \((6^{\&amp;})\) is much more problematic than \((6)\).  But if that is right, then the above, Draper-style argument, even if all of its premises are true, is not as significant as it may initially appear, since if \((6^{\&amp;})\) is not true, the conclusion that theism is more likely to be false than to be true can be undercut by introducing additional evidence of a pro-theist sort.