 Segall (2010), by contrast, accepts that luck egalitarians cannot avoid the abandonment objection by appeal to egalitarian considerations, but can do so if they appeal to moral considerations unrelated to distributive justice—e.g., meeting people’s basic needs. Voorhoeve (2019: 155) similarly adopts a pluralistic view, arguing that a luck egalitarian approach should be combined with a social egalitarian approach since the latter