 Enoch’s argument also has the limitation that it only applies to morality, rather than mind-dependence views of normativity in general. This limitation appears on the face of the argument, since it relies on the premise that it is morally objectionable not to stand our ground in some moral disagreements. It does not seem equally objectionable in any sense to compromise in cases of epistemic, or aesthetic, or prudential disagreements (though maybe the case could be made in some or all of these domains).