 These lists summarize much of the work done by historians of science and historically informed philosophers of science. They are meant to present cases of empirical successes that were (supposedly) brought about by false theoretical hypotheses, hence offering a fresh source of historical challenges to realism. At first sight, the cases provided look substantially different from the majority of Laudan’s examples (viz. the successes, in at least some of them, are more impressive). Yet, it remains to be seen whether they are more troublesome for scientific realism.