 Furthermore, we might imagine an even further expansion of our 2x2 matrix to a 3x3 matrix. Consider that the above picture, divided four ways, does not neatly make room for epistemological projects that combine coarse-grained and fine-grained attitudes. One example is Jennifer Lackey’s (2000) approach to defeaters in epistemology—in which a sufficientdegrees of confidence against the target proposition can undermine the justification one has for believing the target proposition. Another example is Sosa’s approach to suspension of judgment (2021: Ch. 4), which combines coarse-grained and fine-grained attitudes in the an evaluation of the quality of suspension of judgment. That is, for Sosa, the quality of suspended judgment is sensitive to both (i) the competence by which you align your degrees of confidence with your corresponding degrees of epistemic probability, as well as (ii) the competence by which you judge or suspend within the respective proper bounds of confidence. Finally, our table expands even more when we make room for cases of mixed methodology (formal and informal) to subject matter that includes combinations of coarse-grained, fine-grained and mixed attitudes of interest.