 While metaepistemological error theory and noncognitivism represent the most notable examples of metaepistemological views that are anti-realist in virtue of denying epistemic facts, there have been—throughout the history of epistemology—a wide variety of views that would qualify as anti-realist in virtue of maintaining that epistemic facts are mind-dependent in a way that the realist will reject. Here we will discuss two such positions: idealism and relativism.