 Critics of the model don’t deny the general conclusion that Weisberg and Muldoon draw: that cognitive diversity or division of cognitive labor can favor social epistemic  outcomes.[8]  What they deny is that the Weisberg and Muldoon model adequately supports that conclusion. A particularly intriguing model that does support that conclusion, built on a very different model of diversity, is that of Hong and Page (2004). But it also supports a point that Alexander et al. emphasize: that the advantages of cognitive diversity can very much depend on the epistemic landscape being explored.