 Other feminist arguments focus instead, or as well, on the broader role pornographic representations may play in harming other of women’s significant interests. Some have suggested that pornography can be viewed as a sort of false advertising about women and sexuality, or as being akin to libelous speech – speech that defames women as a group, causing corresponding harm to their reputation, credibility, opportunities and income expectations. They argue that women as a group have a right to (civil) legal protection from these harms and to claim compensation for such harm as pornographic speech can be demonstrated to have produced (Longino 1980; Hill 1987; MacKinnon 1995, 3–28; for criticism, see Soble 1985). This is a promising strategy for anti-pornography feminists, since liberals already generally accept that individuals have a right to protection from libelous or defamatory speech.