  A more charitable reading of the argument (see Winkler 1989, 184–7; Lennon 1988) makes Berkeley’s point that we cannot represent unconceivedness, because we have never and could never experience  it.[7]   Because we cannot represent unconceivedness, we cannot conceive of mind-independent objects. While this is a rather more promising argument, it clearly presupposes representationalism, just as Berkeley’s earlier Principles arguments  did.[8]   (This, however, is not necessarily a defect of the interpretation, since the Principles, as we saw above, is aimed against representationalism, and in the Dialogues the Master Argument crops up only after Hylas has been converted to representationalism (see  below).)[9]