 The second objection to Roemer’s account is that his domination condition is ad hoc and unsatisfactory. As Kymlicka points out, the condition is ad hoc since it is “disconnected from the ‘ethical imperative’ [the distribution of productive assets] that [Roemer] identifies as the basis of exploitation theory” (Kymlicka 2002: 204 n. 13). And Roemer himself admits that lack of clarity regarding the concept of dominance prevents his account from being a “satisfactory analytical account of exploitation” (Roemer 1982b: 304 n. 12).