  The above formulation of actualism is subject to the problem of jointly unfulfillable obligations. That is, it generates multiple obligations such that it is impossible for the agent to fulfill all of them. For example, Procrastinate is obligated to ⟨decline to review the paper⟩ because this would result in a better outcome than the outcome that would follow ⟨agreeing to review the paper⟩. On the other hand, Procrastinate is obligated to ⟨agree to review the paper &amp; write the review⟩ because doing so would have a better outcome than the outcome of ⟨declining to review the paper &amp; not reviewing the paper⟩. This is a problem for Jackson and Pargetter’s version of actualism, to be discussed below. Goldman’s and Sobel’s versions of actualism are formulated precisely to avoid this problem.  To see how Goldman avoids this problem, consider the following formulation of actualism that Goldman (1976: 471) considers and rejects: