 On Segall’s (2010: 119), view therefore, justice demands, first, that we improve the health of those who have been most prudent in taking care of their health, that is, whose health deficits are most due to brute luck. For individuals who have exercised equal prudence regarding their health, justice demands, second, that priority be given to those whose health deficit is greatest—i.e., are worse off (Segall 2010: 119). In contrast to a luck egalitarian view, Segall’s (2010: 120) luck prioritarian view is not concerned with realizing equality in health, but rather with “prioritizing the opportunity for health of the worse off”.