Suppose that one ought to have the means-end belief and one ought (to  intend to E and to intend to M).  However, one avoids incoherence by  dropping the means-end belief, not intending to E, and not intending to  M.  Intuitively, one has satisfied some requirement.  This is what the  Satisfaction Claim reflects.  But one hasn’t adopted the particular  attitudes (or patterns) that one ought to adopt.  How, then, are we to  explain the Satisfaction Claim?