 There are many kinds of parodies of Ontological Arguments. The aim is to construct arguments which non-theists can reasonably claim to have no more reason to accept than the original Ontological Arguments themselves. Of course, theists may well be able to hold that the originals are sound, and the parodies not—but that is an entirely unrelated issue. (All theists—and no non-theists—should grant that the following argument is sound, given that the connectives are to be interpreted classically: “Either 2+2=5, or God exists. Not 2+2=5. Hence God exists.” This argument contributes nothing positive to any case for theism, just as the argument “Either 2+2=5, or God does not exist. Not 2+2=5. Hence God does not exist.” contributes nothing positive to the case for non-theism.)