 Another critic of Skow 2016 is Väyrynen (2019), who argues that while Skow’s theory ought to apply to normative explanation as well as to empirical explanation, the theory does not account for reason-enablers that are important in normative explanation. Consider the question of why I ought to shovel the snow from my neighbor’s sidewalk. That I can do it, Väyrynen argues, enables other facts to be reasons why I ought to, but that I can do it may be neither a reason why I ought to do it nor a reason why some other fact is a reason why I ought to do it.