  Robert Yanal offers a resolution to the paradox by denying the third  premise, that repeaters feel genuine suspense on repeated encounters  with familiar narratives. Yanal’s emotional misidentification view  holds that there are no true repeaters, only misidenitifiers. He  argues that since suspense requires uncertainty, the best account for the any claim that the same movie was just as suspenseful on the 4th, 5th, or 6th viewing is that the recidivist is confused, mislabeling  his emotional response. The recidivist is not feeling suspense,  only anticipation. Uncertainty is necessary for suspense, but not for mere anticipation. 