 A question that has been center stage in several preceding sections is: What sorts of transgressions do Turiel’s moral criterion judgments, and other related experimental procedures (collectively dubbed the “moral/conventional task”), classify as moral? Social domain theorists claim that the task picks out transgressions that involve harm, justice, and rights (and more recently fairness and equality). Haidt, Shweder, and others claim that their versions of the task picks out a wide range of transgressions, and that different sorts of transgressions are picked out in different cultures. Nichols claims that his version of the task picks out transgressions of socially learned norms that engender high affect. And Royzman and colleagues argue that for experimental participants who are able to think clearly about counterfactual issues, their version of the task picks out harmful transgressions, where harm is construed broadly.