 Ben Davies and Julian Savulescu (2019) provide an alternative argument for holding individuals responsible for the health behaviors. They argue that where healthcare systems are grounded in solidarity, people have obligations to fellow members of the system to protect their health and may be held responsible for some or all of the costs of treatment that result from a failure to do so. Solidarity, Davies and Savulescu (2019: 135) argue, is a two-way street, meaning that members of a system founded in solidarity not only have claims on other members of the system, but also obligations to them. These obligations include a duty not to impose unreasonable costs on members of the system, with such costs being the result of refusals of “Golden Opportunities”, that is, refusals to make realistically adoptable, health promoting behavioral changes, which are performed under conditions conducive to responsible choice (Davies &amp; Savulescu 2019: 139–140). Davies and Savulescu (2019, 141) caution however, that it is only permissible to hold people responsible for refusals of Golden Opportunities if solidarity is practiced in the broader social system, meaning that all people are held responsible for failures of solidarity—e.g., including the rich for tax avoidance.