 If the epistemology of belief includes both informal (A) and formal (C) approaches, and the epistemology of credence also admits of formal (D) and informal approaches (B), we can envision how this might differently frame the “credence-first” versus “belief-first” debate described above. For one thing, this wider option space would invite us to ask whether (under the credence-first slogan) we should think of cells B and D as more fundamental than work in cells A and C, or rather, just that work in cell D is more fundamental than work in cell A. Likewise, the wider option space invites us to consider whether (under the belief-first slogan) we should think of cells A and C as more fundamental than work in cells B and D, or rather, just that work in cell A is more fundamental than work in cell D.