 There are two ways Roemer—and those theorists who appeal to antecedent injustice in ‘historical’ accounts of exploitation—might resist the objections advanced by Vrousalis, Zwolinski and others. First, one could expand the scope of injustice (Ferguson 2020); alternatively, one could bite the bullet and attempt to explain why such cases are not, in fact, instances of exploitation (Ferguson 2016a). Let’s examine each in turn.