 Unfortunately, however, self/other utilitarianism accommodates only one of two types of agent-centered options: namely, agent-sacrificing options. Agent-sacrificing options are options to either maximize the overall good or sacrifice your own greater interests (and the overall good) for the sake of doing more to promote the lesser interests of others. But just as important are agent-favoring options. Agent-favoring options are options to either maximize the overall good or favor promoting your own interests over promoting the overall good. To illustrate, suppose that you legally and justifiably possess two tablets of an opioid drug. Now, given your built-up tolerance to this drug, you would need to take both tablets to alleviate your moderate pain. But there are two strangers who are also in moderate pain, and they would each need only one tablet to alleviate their pain, for they have no built-up tolerance to this drug. Thus, you can either take both tablets yourself or give the two strangers one tablet each. And the latter would be better overall, as it would alleviate twice as much pain. Nevertheless, it seems that you are permitted to do either, which is an intuitive verdict that self/other utilitarianism cannot accommodate.