 Fine’s (2020) new holism parachutes in from R. M. Sainsbury’s (1996) characterization of vagueness in terms of boundarylessness. A precise predicate such as ‘thirty-something’ organizes cases into pigeonholes. Positive cases commence at thirty and cease at thirty nine. But paradigms and foils of ‘thirty-ish’ operate as poles of a magnet. Candidates for ‘thirty-ish’ resemble iron filings. This force field prevents completion of a forced march sorites argument (in which we are marched from a definite instance of a predicate to a definite non-instance). Judgment must be suspended somewhere in series. But it does not follow that there is any specific case such that one must suspend judgment about it.