 Among those who endorse at least certain Dutch Book arguments, some regard them as establishing rationality requirements without embracing the idea that Dutch Book vulnerability involves a kind of inconsistency.  This avoids the problem of making sense of the inconsistency involved in Dutch Book vulnerability, but faces challenges in specifying the sort of rationality that is at stake.  Responses to the Dutch Strategy argument for Reflection have prompted a particularly wide array of attitudes towards Dutch Book vulnerability.  It is striking that nearly a century after the publication of Ramsey’s paper, there remains so much disagreement and continued work on how to understand Dutch Book arguments.