 Universalizing views try to identify a regime that fairly advances everyone’s interests in accord with how individuals understand those interests. Rawls exemplifies this view: a theory of justice justifies claims that citizens make on one another’s conduct from our perspectives. Given how much people disagree, Rawls knows that gaining traction on justification is complex, and he responds by converting it into a problem of social choice. Rawls: “the question of justification [can be] settled by working out a problem of deliberation” (Rawls 1971, 16). Principles of justice are publicly justified when parties to a proper choice situation select them.