 It is open to any given mind-dependence theory to argue that it does not have the morally objectionable entailment suggested in the ICE argument. Perhaps the theory could argue that it’s impossible for the relevant mental state not to be in conflict with other relevant mental states, or the non-normative facts – maybe, that is, it is impossible for the ideally coherent eccentric in question to exist. On the other hand, mind-dependence theorists could argue, as Sharon Street (2009) does, that the ICE could exist, and that the relevant normative entailments do obtain – but that they are not problematic. That is, for instance, perhaps the ideal Caligula really does have a reason to torture for fun