 Turning to theories of global health justice, a number of scholars defend sufficientarian accounts, according to which all people are entitled to some minimum level of health or opportunity to be healthy. Sridhar Venkatapuram (2011: 224) defends a cosmopolitan account of global health justice according to which all people have an entitlement to the capability to be healthy, secured at a threshold sufficient to ensure their equal human dignity. Jennifer Prah Ruger (2018: 82) defends an institutionalist sufficientarian approach, “provincial globalism”, according to which states and the broader global community have an obligation to ensure that all people enjoy a threshold level of central health capabilities. Others defend the human right to health, understood as a right to “protection against ‘standard threats’ to health” (Wolff 2012: 27), or as a right to those things necessary for a basic minimum of health and so for a minimally good life (Hassoun 2020; see also Powers &amp; Faden 2006: 85).