 Price (2012) proposes a blend of evidential and causal decision theory and motivates it with an analysis of cases in which an agent has foreknowledge of an event occurring by chance. Causal decision theory on its own accommodates such cases, argues Bales (2016).  Ahmed (2014a) champions evidential decision theory and advances several objections to causal decision theory. His objections assume some controversial points about rational choice, including a controversial principle for sequences of choices.