 Shogenji’s measure of coherence is criticized by other authors, many of whom offer their own, preferred measures (Akiba 2000; Olsson 2002, 2005; Glass 2002; Bovens &amp; Hartmann 2003; Fitelson 2003; Douven and Meijs 2007). Which measure is correct, if any, remains controversial, as does the fate of Klein &amp; Warfield’s argument against coherentism. Another line of probabilistic attack on coherentism, which we won’t explore here, comes from Huemer (1997) and is endorsed by Olsson (2005). Huemer (2011) later retracts the argument though, on the grounds that it foists unnecessary commitments on the coherentist. More details are available in  the entry on coherentism.