 Other feminists have sought an expanded version of deliberative theory that can take what they see as better account of impediments to the participation of women and other marginalized groups. Thus, Young substitutes communicative for deliberative democracy in order to expand the scope of considerations beyond the exchange of reasons to include story-telling as well as argumentation on grounds close to Fricker’s and Dotson’s concerns: namely that power relations can stifle speech (1996, 123). Likewise Simone Chambers looks to a melding of deliberative and diversity theory (2003, 322) while Noelle McAfee (2008) looks beyond a Habermasian proceduralism to an integrative model of public deliberation that respects the importance of multiple, partial views. 