 A second problem of the import of the BIP is that it does not, as it stands, take account of the interests of others. In the first place I might be able to improve the situation of child A but only at the cost of worsening that of child B. Every child should be considered of equal value. Yet we may not be able to promote the interests of every child to the same degree. The BIP directs courts, social workers or medical practitioners in some case to promote the interests of a particular child. This should not be done by treating the interests of any other child who might be affected as having no value or a lesser value than those of the particular child attended to. Yet, as with adults there are questions of what fairness requires in balancing the interests of the different children affected by any decision or state of affairs. It would not be reasonable to expect that parents should view the interests of their own children as having the same weight as that of other children. It is reasonable to ask policy makers and care professionals to do so.