 But then other problems loom. One is this. If the F-ness of God = God, if, for example, the wisdom of God = God, then God is a property instance. But God is a person. How could a person be a property instance? From the frying pan into the fire? How could the stupendous and super-eminent reality of God be reduced to something as ontologically flimsy as a property instance? The problem displayed as an inconsistent triad: (a) God is a property instance; (b) God is a person; (c) No person is a property instance.