 Legal scholars have drawn parallels between naked statistical evidence and DNA evidence in cold-hit cases (Roth 2010). The peculiarity of cold-hit cases is that the defendant is identified through a database search of several different genetic profiles, and as a consequence, the evidence in cold-hit cases consists almost exclusively of a DNA match between the crime traces and the defendant (see earlier discussion in  §2.2).  The match—as is customary—is complemented by a statistical estimate of the frequency of the profile, say, one in one hundred million people share the same matching profile. Given the largely statistical nature of the evidence, cold-hit cases can be seen as realistic examples of scenarios such as Prisoner or Gatecrasher. But whether we should think about cold-hit cases in this way is contested. Some authors place naked statistical evidence and cold-hit matches on a par (Smith 2018) and others do not (Enoch and Fisher 2015; Enoch, Spectre, and Fisher 2012).