 So, on the one hand, it’s clear that both notational consequentializing and pragmatic consequentializing produce gimmicky act-consequentialist counterpart theories by employing the Footian Procedure but unclear why this should be objectionable. On the other hand, it’s clear that it would be objectionable for the earnest consequentializer to produce a gimmicky act-consequentialist counterpart theory but unclear why we should think that they would given that they employ the Coherentist Procedure rather than the Footian Procedure.