 Sosa’s approach may be contrasted with three different kinds of approaches, due to Linda Zagzebski (1996, 2020), Christoph Kelp (2021a,b), and Jane Friedman (2020, forthcoming)—as each hold different views about how norms governing good (and bad) inquiry should be conceived of, in connection with norms governing belief, under the banner of epistemology. For Zagzebski, there can be no meaningful distinction between gnoseology and intellectual ethics because our constitutive attempts at knowing are exercises of intellectual character virtues that, themselves, reflect our motivations and values as inquirers. For example, for Zagzebski, knowledge just is gaining a true belief because of an intellectual virtue, which she construes as a