  How, concretely, could an agent’s better judgment go astray in  this way? Perhaps her survey of what she took to be the relevant  considerations did not include, or did not attach sufficient weight  to, what were in fact significant reasons in favor of one of the  possible courses of action. She may have overlooked these, or  (wrongly) deemed them not to be reasons, or failed to appreciate  their full force; and in that case her judgment of what it is best to do will be incorrect. Consider, for example, Jonathan Bennett’s  Huckleberry Finn (Bennett 1974, discussed in  McIntyre 1990), who akratically fails to turn in his slave  friend Jim to the authorities. Huck’s judgment that he ought to do  so, however, was based primarily on what he took to be the force of  Miss Watson’s property rights; it ignored his powerful feelings of  friendship and affection for Jim, as well as other highly relevant  factors. His “better judgment” was thus not in fact a  very comprehensive judgment; it did not take into account the full  range of relevant considerations.