 This objection, however, is open to the following reply.  The reason that I am justified in believing the proposition that either God does not exist or there is a pen in my pocket is that I am justified in believing that there is a pen in my pocket.  The proposition that either God does not exist or there is a pen in my pocket therefore does not represent the total evidence that I have.  But the argument in question cannot be set out in terms of the proposition that, we can suppose, does in this case represent one’s total evidence—namely, the proposition that there is a pen in my pocket—since that proposition is not entailed by \(\negt G\).