 Manley &amp; Wasserman (2008) object that this defence of SCA falls prey to what they call the problem of ‘Achilles’ heels’ (for more on Manley &amp; Wasserman’s objection, see Bonevac, Dever &amp; Sosa 2011; Choi 2011b; Manley &amp; Wasserman 2011). Hajek (forthcoming) agrees with Choi and Gundersen that the alleged counterexamples to SCA fail but disagrees with them, arguing that SCA is susceptible to what he calls ‘minkish’ counterexamples. Another line of criticism of Choi and Gundersen’s strategy is to appeal to the intrinsicness of dispositions, which we will discuss in the next section.