 First, what is the important scope of mind-dependence? Is the important question whether some normative facts are mind-dependent, or whether all such facts are? We think it is the latter. Mark Schroeder claims, with regard to reasons in particular, that it is uncontroversial that some reasons are explained by mental states – Ronnie has a reason to go to the dance because he loves to dance, but Bradley has a reason to avoid the dance because he hates dancing. What would be controversial is the idea that all reasons are explained by mental states; this is actually entailed by Schroeder’s “Humean” view of reasons (Schroeder 2007). We agree that the interesting question is whether all normative facts are mind-dependent, or whether, instead, some are mind-independent.