 Consequentializing has its fair share of detractors. Some deny that it’s possible to consequentialize every plausible non-consequentialist theory. Others see it as possible but consider it a mere gimmick. Others, still, take it to be possible and more than a mere gimmick but find the resulting act-consequentialist counterpart theories to be explanatorily inadequate. Unfortunately, though, those leveling such objections haven’t always been careful to note that there are different types of consequentializing and that many of these objections apply only to certain types. Below, I’ll consider these and other objections to consequentializing as well as which types of consequentializing are subject to them.