 For some proponents of group rights, we should look for the integrity essential for right-bearing neither in the group’s internal organization nor in its objective characteristics but in its subjectivity. What matters is that the individuals who make up the group feel themselves strongly bound together as members of a group with which they identify. Marlies Galenkamp holds that a right-holding group must possess a strong form of intra-group solidarity and be the kind of group that communitarians describe as a constitutive community (1993, 81–100, 111–2, 131; see also Segesvary 1995). Michael McDonald (1991) argues that it is a shared understanding amongst individuals that they are normatively bound to each other that makes them a group for moral purposes. That shared understanding may be related to and promoted by shared objective characteristics, such as a common history, language, system of belief or social condition, but it is still the subjectivity of the group rather than those objective features that is crucial to its being a right-bearing group. Larry May (1987) and Paul Sheehy (2006, 151–173) also find the source of a group’s moral status in the interrelatedness of its members, but argue those interrelationships are significant for the common interests and needs to which they give rise.