 A problem with this response is that there doesn’t appear to be any reason to regard the notion of a local* property as a notion of intrinsicality. While it is common to intuitively characterise intrinsicality by either explicitly using talk of parts or using talk that very plausibly makes reference to parts, this is not the case for ontological dependence talk. As a result, the notion of a local* property seems no more a notion of intrinsicality than, for example, the notion of a local** property, which is characterised by (25) and (26). 