 We conclude our discussion with so-called Zombie-Arguments  (Makinson and Schlechta 1991,  Touretzky et al. 1991). Recall that a skeptical reasoner does not commit to a conflicting argument.  Makinson and Schlechta (1991)  argue that super-arguments of such conflicted arguments —although not acceptable— nevertheless still have the power to undermine the commitment of a reasoner to an otherwise unconflicted argument. We see an example in the following figure: 