  Davidson’s innovative suggestion is that judgments with this PF  logical form are an appropriate way to model what happens in the  early stages of practical reasoning, where we rehearse reasons for  and against the options we are considering. And his stressing that no such PF judgment commits the agent to an overall evaluative  conclusion in favor of a or b is useful in thinking about a case like Julie’s ((1) above). We described Julie as knowing  (and therefore believing) that b was more expensive than  a, but opting for b nonetheless. We can imagine,  then, that among the ingredients of Julie’s practical reasoning was a PF judgment like this: