 There are other instances where it is not clear whether Timon is simply reproducing Pyrrho’s outlook or adding creatively to it. For example, Diogenes reports that in the Pytho Timon offered a gloss on the phrase ‘no more’ (ouden mallon), namely, ‘determining nothing and withholding assent’ (9.76). The phrase ouden mallon became a stock Pyrrhonist expression, and occurs several times in connection with Pyrrho’s own views. But is Timon here giving his own distinctive explanation of the significance of this phrase? Given the meager evidence available, we cannot hope to settle the matter. As noted earlier, the passage of Aristocles that expounds the early Pyrrhonist position is also controversial in this respect. While the passage as a whole has generally been taken to be giving us the philosophy of Pyrrho (via the medium of a summary by Timon), it has also been suggested that large parts of the position outlined here are in fact additions by Timon to a core idea of Pyrrho’s (see the entry on Pyrrho for details, also Brunschwig (1994), Marchard (2018)). Since so much of what we know about Pyrrho comes through Timon, the line between these two possibilities is often very difficult to draw.