  “First,” Aristotle says, “there is the argument  about its being impossible to move because what moves must reach the  half-way point earlier than the end” (Ph.  6.9, 239b11–13). He says no more about this argument here  but alludes to his earlier discussion of it in Physics 6.2,  where, after arguing that both time and magnitude are continuous, he  asserts: “Therefore the argument of Zeno falsely presumes that  it is not possible to traverse or make contact with unlimited things  individually in a limited time” (233a21–3).  Subsequently, in Physics 8.8, he again raises the question  of how to respond “to those posing the question of Zeno’s  argument, if one must always pass through the half-way point, and  these are unlimited, and it is impossible to traverse things  unlimited” (263a4–6), and he proceeds to offer what  he claims is a more adequate solution than the one presented in  Physics 6.2. The argument Aristotle is alluding to in these  passages gets its name from his mention in Topics 8.8 of  “Zeno’s argument that it is not possible to move or to traverse the stadium” as a prime example of an argument opposed to  common belief yet difficult to resolve (160b7–9).