 The PJP only explains how to justify coercion (or some related form of demand). It includes no other moral principle that describes why coercion is problematic. Nor does it explain how to handle unjustified coercion. So, one might combine the PJP with a consequentialist norm. Unjustified coercion, on this view, merits minimization. Or we could adopt a deontological side constraint on using unjustified coercion. Again, on this matter, the PJP is silent.