 Perhaps a final question that arises in the context of a discussion of Cavendish and panpsychism is about artificial intelligence. Cavendish would agree that a creature would never exhibit thinking if the elemental bodies of nature did not have features like thought and perception. In that circumstance, there is absolutely no chance, and no risk, that a computer would ever think, no matter its program, and a robot would never think, no matter how complicated the arrangement of its parts. But Cavendish holds that the elemental bodies of nature do exhibit thought and perception. There is no chance that a machine would think just in virtue of the size and shape of the bodies that compose it, but an artist or technologist might still create a thinking machine – not in virtue of its code or its wiring, but in virtue of the mentality of the bodies that are blended with them. As we will see, Cavendish has numerous reservations about human artifice. A twenty-first-century application of her view is to note that (non-panpsychist) artists and technologists are being naive and reckless in any attempt to create a powerful and efficient machine that merely simulates thinking; they lack a proper appreciation of what it is that is thereby combined.