 The position that God is not responsible for our sins was of course uncontroversial. None of the authors who defended the idea that God is a concurrent cause (in one way or the other) thought that God thereby becomes morally responsible for them. But what is philosophically important in Olivi’s view is that he refuses to accept any other way to safeguard the impeccability of God except the denial of his role as a concurrent cause in the free actions of our will. This view is closely related to his conception of the freedom of the will but he seems to extend the argument from the human will to created causes in general; at least he uses physical causation as an example that illuminates the mutual roles of created causes and God: