  P2, Davidson observes, “connects judgements of what it is  better to do with motivation or wanting” (p. 23); he adds  later that it “states a mild form of internalism”  (p. 26). Davidson is proposing, contra the extreme  externalist position, that our evaluative judgments about the merits  of the options we deem open to us are not motivationally inert. While he admits that one could quibble or tinker with the formulation of P1 and P2 (pp. 23–4; p. 27; p. 31), he is confident that they or something like them give expression to a powerfully  attractive picture of practical reasoning and intentional action, one which assigns an important motivational role to the agent’s  evaluative   judgments.[8] 