 We are, as Michael Bratman (1983; 1987) stresses, planning creatures. Our reasoning is structured by our plans, which enable us to achieve complex personal and social goals. To benefit from planning, one must take plans seriously. For Bratman, this involves, among other things, (i) recognizing a general rational pressure favoring sticking to one’s plan so long as there is no problem with the plan (Bratman 2006, section 8), and (ii) “taking seriously how one will see matters at the conclusion of one’s plan, or at appropriate stages along the way, in the case of plans or policies that are ongoing” (1999, 86). In accordance with these proposed requirements, Bratman (1999) concludes that rationality at least sometimes calls for sticking to a plan even if this is not called for by one’s current preferences. Moreover, although this conception of rationality requires that one sometimes resist one’s current preferences, it is taken to prompt more sensible choices in challenging dynamic choice situations than do conceptions of rationality whose dictates do not take plans seriously.