But one might worry about how well this account explains the  Violation and Satisfaction Claims.  On this view, the requirements  violated, or satisfied, are simply standards of proper rational  functioning.  These standards can be used to evaluate how well particular  agents are functioning, in the same way that standards of what makes for  a well-functioning perceptual apparatus can be used to evaluate how  well particular perceivers are functioning.  But, rational requirements  also seem to call for some response.  For instance, when we  advise others who are in violation of rational requirements, such as  those who are instrumentally incoherent, we say that some change in  attitude is called for.  And, when we ourselves are  instrumentally incoherent, we feel some “normative pressure” to  change our attitudes in some way (see Kolodny 2005, §4). It’s unclear  how these features of rational requirements could be explained by a view  that takes them to be merely evaluative.  