 So far we have assumed that the Aristocles passage is supposed to represent the thought of Pyrrho. But, as noted earlier, some scholars have questioned that assumption (see especially Brunschwig (1994), Marchand (2018)). Their reason is that there is only one place in the Aristocles passage that reads “Timon says that Pyrrho says …”; this is the threefold statement about the nature of things. Elsewhere Aristocles says “Timon says”, but nowhere else are we specifically told that Timon is conveying the thought of Pyrrho. Admittedly Aristocles introduces Pyrrho as one of those who question our ability to know things, but he may have thought that Timon’s own (written) ideas are the closest we can get to Pyrrho’s (unwritten) ideas. Hence it is not obvious that anything beyond the threefold statement about the nature of things should actually be attributed to Pyrrho himself. Of course, when Aristocles says “Timon says”, he may have meant this as short for “Timon says Pyrrho says”, but he may also have intended to distinguish between the contributions of Pyrrho and of Timon.