 Such orderings make sense only if the bracketed clauses in Q and R are omitted. W. Davis (2016a: 159) responds that Levinson’s ordering makes it is hard to see why  (10)  or  (12)  should have an R implicature rather than a Q implicature, while Huang’s ordering makes it hard to explain why  (11)  and  (13)  have Q  implicatures.[49]