  We initially described weak-willed action as free, intentional action contrary to the agent’s better judgment; it may be useful to see how Davidson’s more precise definition matches up with that initial characterization. Davidson’s condition (a) requires that the action in question be intentional.[6] Condition (b) seems intended to ensure that the action in question is   free.[7]  Part (c) of Davidson’s definition represents what we have called the  agent’s “better judgment,” that is, the overall  evaluation of his options contrary to which the incontinent agent  acts.