 The most common response, endorsed by both Ruth Sample (2003) and Jeremy Snyder (2008), is that parties gain enough when what they gain is sufficient to ensure their basic needs are met. More specifically, both authors argue that exploitation involves a failure to respect the value of those with who we transact. When we encounter others whose basic needs are unmet, we should help them because of the inherent value they possess as a human being. In contrast, exploiters see in the unmet basic needs of others not a cry for help but as an opportunity for profit. When they enrich themselves without ensuring these basic needs are met, they transact unfairly with them.