 Some normative proposals seek to accommodate global sensitivity within expected utility theory, by making the inputs of the utility function more fine-grained. Proponents of this “refinement strategy” hold that decision-makers prefer \(L_4\) to \(L_3\) because the $0 outcome in \(L_3\) would induce regret that one forewent a sure $1M (alternatively, because \(L_4\) includes psychological certainty) and therefore that the consequence-descriptions should include these facts. Thus, the correct description of \(L_3\) is: