 is true in this case. Yet intuitively, it is not true that the agent ought to gamble. Absent further information, gambling and not gambling both have their pros and cons in this case, and hence one would not make any recommendation for  either.[71]  More generally, Horty takes this example to show that from “it ought to be that the agent brings about \(p\)”, it does not follow that “the agent ought to bring about  \(p\)”.[72]