 The success, then, of constructive empiricism as an account of science does not depend on how science is understood or undertaken by actual scientists. Still, one might start to question the empirical adequacy of constructive empiricism’s interpretation of science if the account was dramatically at odds with the attitudes and practices of actual scientists. Fortunately, then, for the defender of constructive empiricism, recent evidence indicates that is not the case. Based on a methodical survey of practicing scientists, Beebe and Dellsén (2020, 359–361) suggest that the attitudes of contemporary scientists are largely in line with the constructive empiricist’s views of theory acceptance and science’s aims.