 One of the most significant divides in contemporary epistemology concerns the granularity of the target psychological phenomena of interest: some projects in epistemology (e.g., the traditional analysis of knowledge) make use primarily of belief and its cognates (e.g., disbelief, and suspended judgment)—all of which are comparatively coarse grained in comparison with credences—the target psychological phenomena of central interest to Bayesian epistemologists—which are fine-grained and precise, and which represent a thinker’s subjective probability or confidence with respect to a proposition.