  However, since no actually existing thing could have been an Exotic,  anything that is an Exotic in some possible world cannot be among the things that exist in the actual world. Thus, the truth conditions  that basic possible world semantics assigns to some of our intuitive  modal beliefs appear to entail that there are non-actual individuals  as well as non-actual possible worlds. Defining possible worlds as  SOAs provided a way for the actualist to embrace non-actual worlds  without compromising her actualism. But how is the actualist to  understand the apparent commitment to non-actual individuals in such truth conditions as (25)? 