 Thus, pragmatic consequentializing aims to consequentialize some plausible non-consequentialist theory using the Footian Procedure to come up with an act-consequentialist counterpart that can then be employed for some practical purpose. For instance, Lazar (2017) consequentializes the deontic verdicts that his non-consequentialist theory yields in situations involving perfect information so that he can then use the tools of decision theory on the resulting act-consequentialist counterpart to determine what deontic verdicts his non-consequentialist theory yields in situations involving imperfect information.