 A valuable contribution to the discussion about Molyneux’s Problem is Ferretti and Glenney (2021), a collection of one poem and twenty essays that explore the long-standing issues Molyneux’s problem presents to philosophy of mind, perception and the senses. It considers the question from an interdisciplinary angle, examines its pre-history, and perspectives from religion and disability. The essays are arranged around five criticisms: (1) Molyneux’s appropriation of the question from another source; (2) the encouragement of bias against people with blindness, a social failure called ocularism; (3) a lack of specificity resulting in ambiguity as to what might count as a satisfying answer; (4) a crude generality that belies the underlying complexity of vision and touch; and (5) the incapability to be experimentally testable, though presumably designed to be so (Ferretti and Glenney, 2021, p. 2).