 While the vast majority of those now writing on collective responsibility in philosophical circles continue to debate the possibility of collective responsibility, a growing number of scholars have in recent years placed three further—and very important—concerns at the center of our attention. The first has to do with whether groups have to meet the same stringent conditions of moral responsibility that individuals do. (Intentionality becomes a primary site of controversy here.) The second has to do with the advantages and disadvantages of holding particular kinds of groups, e.g., nation states, races, and ethnic groups, morally responsible in practice. The third has to do with what moral implications follow for group members from the moral responsibility of their group for harm. (Do they, too, become morally responsible for the harms and, if so, how is the blame to be distributed?)