 Structural exploitation in Zwolinski’s, McKeowan’s, and Wollner’s senses and transactional exploitation are not mutually exclusive. This is quite clear in Zwolinski’s definition, which directly references an exchange. But both McKeowan and Wollner’s accounts are also compatible with exploitation being a relational property of transactions. One distinction that is sometimes elided in these discussions is between the sources of exploitable vulnerability and those who benefit from this vulnerability. That social systems, norms and institutions make certain groups vulnerable while advancing the interests of others does not entail that these systems themselves benefit from the vulnerability (a feature of exploitations we discuss in the next section). By structuring interactions in such a way that group or individual \(A\) can take unfair advantage of \(B\), they create the conditions that allow \(A\) to exploit \(B\). However, to say that the systems themselves gain from, and thereby exploit \(B\) involves a different (and less plausible) claim.