 Theoretically, we could mix and match any of these supposedly queer features of normativity with any of the views about what queerness consists in. For example, it might be that the problem is that normative beliefs that entail motivation to act would be a fundamental addition to our ontology; maybe the problem is that facts that entail reasons for action are not parsimonious; maybe the supervenience of the normative on the non-normative is not parsimonious. But as a matter of fact, although no one is utterly clear on the question of what queerness consists in, the literature has converged on one family of answers to the question of what the queer feature of normativity is.