 Yet, Enoch argues, this entails that on many mind-dependence theories, we should find a way of compromising in the same way, when we have a moral disagreement. This is easiest to see on the view that our moral judgments simply report mental states, which Enoch calls “Caricatured Subjectivism”. On Caricatured Subjectivism, our moral disagreements just are disagreements about mental states, and so should be governed by Impartiality. Enoch argues that the same result follows on any theory that grounds moral truth in mental states: on such views, we ought to find some way of compromising when we have a moral disagreement.