 Each of the above topics undoubtedly call for further development. See Priest 1987 or Ficara 2014. This list is also not exhaustive. For example, some  connexive logics  are contra-classical (they validate classically invalid arguments) and are even contradictory in their propositional fragment. That is, whereas most motivations for dialetheism come from non-logical sources, connexive logic is dialetheic at the most basic logical level; see Omori and Wansing 2019. Or, for both a motivation and application of dialetheism, Casati 2021 argues for a dialetheic interpretation of the late Heidegger in which Being itself is both an entity and not an entity, and that this can be made sense of through mereology and metaphysical grounding. 