 Haidt’s findings comparing high and low SES participants suggest that there is substantial and systematic variation in judgments about which transgressions are socially transcendent. It might be thought that this variation is best explained by differences in socially transmitted rules like those that Haidt and his colleagues have explored in their more recent work on Moral Foundations Theory (Haidt &amp; Joseph 2007; Graham, Haidt, &amp; Nosek 2009; Haidt 2012; Graham, Haidt, Koleva, et al. 2013). But Royzman, Landy, and Goodwin (2014) proposed a different, and more disquieting, explanation for SES-linked variation in judgments about the social transcendence of transgressions. Social domain theorists recognize that some of the transgressions they classify as conventional can lead to harm by upsetting onlookers (as in Nichols’ table manners case) or by disrupting established social routines. But, Royzman and colleagues note, those harms