 Again, as before, this game can be extended to accommodate the case where agents can claim shares of the good. And if the nonagreement point again results in the payoffs generated by the conflict outcome (H, H), as Braithwaite supposed, then Matthew and Luke are in a Nash bargaining problem with feasible set \(\Lambda\) and nonagreement point \(\bu_0 = \left(0,\frac{1}{9}\right)\).  Figure 11  depicts the feasible set \(\Lambda\) for such a game (again shaded in green). This time, though, the figure also identifies the payoff vectors associated with three solutions concepts that have been especially influential in in game theoretic analyses of the social contract (namely the Nash, proportional, and maximin proportionate gain solutions).