 How, if at all, does this way of thinking about presentism help with the definitional worries? This move might help us to identify a new kind of disagreement between presentists and non-presentists. Presentists can endorse an identity claim, “existing at the present time is existing” and, thus, draw new battlelines. This identity claim is present-tensed and true now; it doesn’t face the same worries as the other statements of presentism (P1, P2, or P3). Nonetheless, the claim is distinctive; it’s not something to which eternalists can assent. Eternalists don’t agree that existing now is existing.c