 They argue that this must involve paraphrases, clearer formulations of 1–3 which can be seen as possibly all true. They compare how the theories of sections  2.1,  2.3, and  1.5  above must do this, and conclude that it is easier for the first of these to provide paraphrases which plausibly express the same claims as the originals, which is a point in favor of such relative identity theories.