  Here, by contrast, we have a genuinely puzzling case, one we cannot  make sense of in the same way. Why would Joseph do f when he assessed e as the superior course of action all things  considered? Joseph’s choice sounds so inexplicable that we might even query whether the case has been accurately described. If Joseph  is really freely choosing f over e, we might think  it questionable that he does genuinely assess e as better  all things considered. Perhaps he actually takes f to be  superior (for him, under the circumstances), although he thinks most  people would opt for e or would say e was a better  choice.