 According to Soames, there are contexts of utterance and worlds of evaluation where (14a) is true but (14b) is false. Accordingly, ‘the actual F is G’ and ‘n is G’ cannot express the same proposition. Hence names cannot be rigidified descriptions. See Nelson (2002) for a response to this argument. (Accounts of rigidified descriptions have been offered elsewhere, see for example Zalta (1988; chapter 5), but typically not as a way to account for the behavior of descriptions in propositional attitude environments.)