 In theology, Kilvington applied the new methods of terminist logic and mathematics to the most popular issues discussed in the fourteenth-century, such as human and divine love, human and divine will, God’s absolute and ordained power and human free decision, divine knowledge of future contingents and predestination. Nothing is considered separately from the Creator; therefore, Kilvington relates each human action to God. Kilvington’s questions on the Sentences testify to his involvement in the lively, contemporary discussions with semi-Pelagians. Thomas Bradwardine argued with John Duns Scotus, William Ockham, Adam Wodeham, Robert Holcot, and Thomas Buckingham, all of whom he regarded as Pelagians. In his commentary on the Sentences, on which he lectured in 1332–1333, Ockham was the theologian he most fiercely attacked. Kilvington most likely lectured on the Sentences in the same year. It also seems obvious that each took part in other's lectures as socii. In his question Utrum actus volunatis per se malus sit per aliquid, Kilvington debates and criticizes Bradwardine’s views (see Jung &amp; Michałowska 2022: 6).