 In sum, although the claim that inequalities due to voluntary chosen health behaviors are not unjust is prima facie plausible, few are willing to endorse it and/or its policy implications without significant qualification. Luck egalitarians either reject it by appealing to further egalitarian considerations or opt for a pluralistic view that enables them to avoid its counter-intuitive policy implications. Similarly, those who adopt either Rawlsian or solidaristic approaches hold that people are only responsible for the outcomes of their voluntarily chosen health behaviors in the context of a just society.