 If a given, concrete formulation of the argument from evil appeals to cases of intrinsically undesirable states of affairs that give rise only to evidential considerations, rather than to an incompatibility conclusion, then, although the existence of God may be improbable relative to that evidence, it may not be improbable relative to one’s total evidence.  Theists, however, have often contended that there are a variety of arguments that, even if they do not prove that God exists, provide positive evidence.  May not this positive evidence outweigh, then, the negative evidence of apparently unjustified evils?