 Even if people’s choices to drink excessively, eat an unhealthy diet, or fail to exercise are voluntary, on this view, if such choices are made under conditions of unjust social disadvantage, people are not responsible for the downstream consequences. Daniels (2011) develops a similar Rawlsian view, but emphasizes that even under conditions of social justice, policymakers should be wary of holding individuals accountable for the costs of their health behaviors. We all have an interest, Daniels argues, in having the freedom to make choices regarding sport, sex, and diet without the fear of social sanction when our choices turn out to be “bad” ones (see also Fleck 2012).