 In light of non-existent objects such as bunyips, and the meaningfulness of bunyip tokens in spite of there being no bunyips, Fodor adjusts his proposal so that meaning now rests on asymmetrical dependences among nomological relations among properties—the property of being a bunyip for example—as opposed to actual causal relations between individuals. Nomological relations are cashed out in terms of counterfactuals, so what we have now is an informational semantics along the lines of the following—bunyip means bunyip because if there were bunyips, bunyips would be the cause of bunyip tokens on which all other causes would depend asymmetrically.