 In an analysis of the contextual analysis and Price equation methods of representing hierarchical selection models, it was argued that contextual analysis is superior overall, except in cases of meiotic drive (Okasha 2006). However, it was recently argued that contextual analysis can even handle cases of meiotic drive, thus making it the superior approach to multilevel selection (Earnshaw 2015). In a separate and helpful analysis, the relationship between kin and multilevel models was spelled out using causal graphs (Okasha 2015). Just because the two models can produce the same changes in gene frequencies, it does not follow that they represent the same causal structure, which is illustrated using causal graph theory and examples from biology, such as group adaptation and meiotic drive (Okasha 2015; see  Genic Selection: The Pluralists).  This goes very much against the claims of equivalence of the two model types, kin and group selection (West, Griffin, &amp; Gardner 2007, 2008; West &amp; Gardner 2013), in which these technical equivalences are taken to signify total equivalence of the evolutionary systems (see also Frank 2013; Queller 1992; Dugatkin &amp; Reeve 1994; Sober &amp; Wilson 1998). Take, for instance, the claim: “There is no theoretical or empirical example of group selection that cannot be explained with kin selection” (West, Griffin, &amp; Gardner 2008: 375),