 Interestingly, consequentializing seems to go nearly as far back as act-consequentialism itself (see Hurley 2020: 27). Indeed, it goes at least as far back as John Stuart Mill’s development of qualitative hedonism in response to the objection that (Benthamite) utilitarianism is, given its commitment to quantitative hedonism, “a doctrine worthy only of swine”. Mill argued that there are certain kinds of pleasures (e.g., intellectual pleasures) that human beings, but not swine, are capable of and that these “higher” pleasures are qualitatively different than the “lower”, bodily pleasures of which both swine and human beings are capable—so much so that no quantity of these lower pleasures could ever be as good as a sufficient quantity of higher pleasures (1861 [1991: 14–17]).