 Public reason liberals argue that reasonable people will disagree about the human good. But they also claim that reasonable people will agree on conceptions of justice. Some critics say these claims are problematic because they are asymmetric. The same factors that drive reasonable pluralism about the good apply to justice, hence the asymmetry. (For discussion and rebuttal, see Quong 2011, 192–220.) This objection applies to a wide range of interpretations of the PJP. But convergence theorists often accept justice pluralism. (Gaus 2011, 276–9; Gaus and Van Schoelandt 2017, Vallier 2019, Gjesdal 2022).