 A creature has moral standing if its interests are morally relevant to the agents whose actions impact it. Stones don’t have moral standing, people do. Moral philosophers disagree about the grounds of moral standing, i.e., that in virtue of which a creature has moral standing. Some argue that the capacity to feel gives a creature moral standing (e.g., Bentham 1781/2011), others favor autonomy (e.g., Kant 2001). What about lay people (for review, see Goodwin 2015)? According to Gray, Gray, and Wegner (2007), lay people side with Bentham: Whether a creature can suffer determines whether it has morally relevant interests (see also Robbins &amp; Jack 2006 and Knobe &amp; Prinz 2008). 