 Compatibilists about determinism and moral responsibility reject this conclusion, so they must reject at least one of the premises. One traditional sort of compatibilist accepts PAP (and P2), and targets P1 and with it the Consequence Argument. This entangles the compatibilist in questions about the ability to do otherwise  (§1.3  and  §4.2.1).  However, if PAP is false, the compatibilist can avoid these difficulties and reject P2 as unsupported. Without PAP in the way, compatibilism receives new energy (see entry on  compatibilism §4).