 In a similar way, the sociologists Donald Warwick and Herbert Kelman distinguish between “environmental” and “psychic” manipulation (Warwick &amp; Kelman 1973). Their work influenced Faden, Beauchamp, and King’s seminal philosophical account of manipulation, which makes a similar distinction (Faden, Beauchamp, &amp; King 1986: 355–68). Anne Barnhill distinguishes between manipulation that “changes the options available to the person or changes the situation she’s in, and thereby changes her attitudes” on the one hand, and manipulation that “changes a person’s attitudes directly without changing the options available to her or the surrounding situation” on the other (Barnhill 2014: 53). Drawing a similar distinction, Claudia Mills writes