 Return now to the question whether normativity can be given a naturalistic explanation. For the expressivist, this is the question whether the normativity of normative judgments can be given a naturalistic explanation. And their answer would presumably be affirmative. We have just sketched the kind of explanation an expressivist would provide. We have, and we endorse, the “belief” we might express by saying it would be bad to drink another Dr. Pepper. This thought consists in having an aversion to drinking another Dr. Pepper. There is a variety of such attitudes or “stances”, to use Blackburn’s term (2006), and they are the characteristic constituents of normative thoughts. For a thought to be normative is, roughly, for it to have some such constituent. This is a sketch of the expressivist answer to our question.