 There are other theoretical options in the literature. See for example those offered in Recanati (2007), Higginbotham (1995, 2010), Chisholm (1981), and Stalnaker (2008). But the Lewis/Perry contrast, where Lewis responds by complicating the objects of belief, and Perry responds by complicating the relations between believers and objects of belief, provides a useful classificatory scheme. Like Lewis, Recanati and Chisholm propose a more complicated account of content than that of the Simple Picture, though their proposed alternatives differ. Higginbotham’s token reflexive account is, we think, usefully grouped with Perry’s view as accounting for self-locating phenomena with the mechanisms by which believers are related to the objects of belief; though again, the theoretically load-bearing features of the relations are different. Stalnaker’s (2008) account also likely belongs with Perry’s. Rather than going into detail about other accounts of self-locating belief, we refer the interested reader to the works cited above.