  Several reading strategies other than the standard have been advocated.   Some feminists advocate a radical departure from the norms of textual  interpretation by focusing, and drawing out the “unthought” of a text;  its images and metaphors; its omissions and paradoxes. (Deutscher 1997)  Others  emphasize the importance of questioning the line demarcating a text  from its cultural, psychological or material context. (Schott 1997)  And yet others  advocate for an active philosophical engagement with a text rather  than the backward-looking activity of trying to determine the exact meaning of a historical text. (LeDoeuff 1991)  These reading strategies, in turn,  raise further issues concerning the limits of the history of philosophy and the criteria for adequate interpretation.