 Setting aside these reservations, we can ask how the attitude of intention should be understood if it is to serve as a distinctive mark of joint action. One approach is to think of it as an attitude of a peculiar, supra-individual  entity.[4]  The intention whose content is expressed by We are running to the shelter is, on this view, an attitude had by whatever entity is denoted by the ‘we’. On this view whenever people act together, they constitute a group that, in a non-figurative sense, intends. This entails that groups can be genuine agents and subjects of intentional attitudes.