 Katherine Brading claimed that with proper attention to the history of physics one can find a satisfying version of presentism that does not require a global present. If one grounds the unity of objects in dynamical laws, as she, invoking DiSalle (2006), claims that Newton did, then she says the present can be viewed as “a spatiotemporal region of whatever size is necessary to sustain the dynamical system in question.” (2013, 1109) Presents construed this way will typically be larger than a single point but will not necessarily exhaust all of Minkowski spacetime or fall afoul of the relativity of simultaneity.