 Ross (see above) opted for facts as the bearers of intrinsic value. This view is defended, among others, by Lemos (1994: 23–5) and Zimmerman (2001: 51ff) although Zimmerman rejects the “fact” terminology and prefers to talk about property-exemplifications. Chisholm and Sosa (1966: 244) assumed that states of affairs are bearers of intrinsic value. But they warned the reader: