  The choices before us, then, as presented by Hare, are Hare’s own  view, or one which assigns no distinctive role in action or practical thought to evaluative judgments, treating them as just like any other judgment. We might call the first of these an extreme version of  (judgment) internalism. (I use this polysemous label to  refer, here, to the idea that certain judgments have an internal or  necessary connection to motivation and to action.) By extension, we  might usefully follow Michael Bratman in calling the second type of  view “extreme externalism” (Bratman 1979,  pp. 158–9).