 This exclusion rests on the merging of the interactor with the reproducer requirements, and as such will not hold sway over those who do not buy such a confounding of roles (e.g., Dupré &amp; O’Malley 2013). This is yet another case wherein distinguishing the interactor question from the replicator/reproducer question can be “more illuminating” (Sterelny 2011: 496; see Dupré &amp; O’Malley 2013; Gilbert, Sapp, &amp; Tauber 2012; Lloyd forthcoming).