 One might challenge Jones’s response in two ways. One might question her assumption that the rule of benevolence presupposes self-love in precisely the way that the Golden Rule presupposes self-love. Broad (1930, 158–9), for example, held that benevolence has no such presupposition. On his view, the ethical hedonist (who advocates benevolence) and the rational egoist have different conceptions of the good—“my Good [says the egoist] and your Good… are not parts of a total Good.” Since they involve distinct conceptions of the good, the formulation of the one position cannot presuppose the truth of the other. Nonetheless, since they make conflicting commands regarding certain conceivable situations, we cannot rationally subscribe to both. 