 Mogensen contends that, contra Risse and Zeckhauser, racial profiling is pro tanto and inherently wrong because it disrespects a person’s interest in being treated in a way that reflects her merits as determined by personal features over which she has control. He points out that other forms of differential treatment based on statistical generalizations about unchosen features – such as minimum age requirements for obtaining a driver’s license-- are also unfair for disrespecting that interest. But Mogensen’s central claim is that, unlike those other forms, “racial profiling of black citizens [is] especially problematic insofar as it is one of a number of injustices that together constitute … . a systematic pattern of injustice” inflicted on blacks and through which they are subordinated to whites (2019: 467). He notes that, on his account, racial profiling would be seriously wrongful, even if it were kept secret from the public and increased the efficiency of law enforcement. 