 Firstly, Fodor’s initial proposal is that non cat-caused tokens of cat are asymmetrically dependent on cat-caused tokens of cat. That is, there would not be any non cat-caused tokens of cat had there not been any cat-caused tokens of cat. Secondly, on Fodor’s picture, meaning and information come apart. The information carried by a token of a concept covaries with its cause, whereas the meaning of a token is what all of the concept’s tokenings have in common—the inner vehicles of our cat tokenings, or their MOPs. Note that Fodor is not, strictly speaking, subsuming information as part of meaning, but rather teasing them apart. Our failure to appreciate that meaning and information come apart is, according to Fodor, a consequence of the fact that firstly, they are very often coextensive, and that secondly, ‘means’ is a homonym for both semantic content (meaning) and information-carrying. Consider the following two uses of “means”: