 This new formulation also entails that all (positive) normative principles are false – which we think error theorists will strongly consider a feature rather than a bug. In a world where all claims of the form “You should believe that P” are false, so will all claims of the form “If P has properties XYZ, then agents in situation S should believe that P” – assuming it is possible for something P to be XYZ. (It’s not totally clear how we should understand normative principles – see Morton (2020); Berker (2018); Rosen (2017) – but surely in a world where it’s not the case that anyone should believe anything, a principle outlining (possible) non-normative circumstances in which someone should believe something is false.)