 On Sosa’s (2021) approach, what goes for the archer goes, mutatis mutandis, for the inquirer. Whereas our evaluation of the inquirer’s constitutive attempts at knowing (viz., her intellectual shots) are assessable as successful, competent, and apt—these are gnoseological or knowledge-related assessments—our evaluations of how the inquirer conducts herself as an inquirer—apart from her constitutive attempts at knowing—also matter, but some of these are best understood as part of a different normative domain of epistemology: intellectual ethics. Here we should distinguish the constitutive attempt to answer the pertinent question knowledgeably, and how that differs from the preliminary attempts to eventually answer the question knowledgeably. Once one gives one’s answer in the constitutive attempt to answer knowledgeably, that is no longer inquiry. Inquiry has a distinctive aim of its own, that of putting oneself in a position to constitutively make one’s attempt to answer knowledgeably. Once one is ready to answer, once one considers oneself to be in a position to make a proper such constitutive attempt, one ceases inquiring, and one then gives one’s answer, even if it is an answer that one gives to oneself in foro interno.