 In a closely related vein some argue that, other things being equal, theories of public reason that include a wider diversity of viewpoints in the constituency of justification are preferable to those that include a narrower set of views in the justificatory constituency. This idea is sometimes referred to as anti-sectarianism, and it has been advanced as a desideratum that speaks in favor of convergence models of public reason and against at least some consensus models (Gaus 2012; Vallier 2017; Vallier and Muldoon 2021). But for criticism of anti-sectariarianism as a desideratum see (Quong 2012, 51–58; Tahzib 2021). 