 Two aspects of Locke’s discussion of this case are salient to the contemporary discussion. The first, of course, is the view that, if I am incapable of recalling having done this or that, then the person responsible for the action in question is not the person I am, even if the person who is responsible for that action occupied the same human animal presently occupied by the person I am (see Johansson 2016, D. Shoemaker 2009, 2016, and Sauchelli 2017a). The second is the idea that the first-person pronoun can refer equivocally in a way that  tracks the human/person distinction (see  section 3.2).