 Second, it would be good to get a clearer idea of what kind of dependence is involved in mind-dependence. In brief, we are going to try to be as ecumenical as possible, not tying mind-dependence to any narrowly defined or parochial metaphysical relation. Rather, mind-dependence concerns broad metaphysical dependence on the mental. This is for two reasons: first, this just seems to us to be what important debate in the vicinity is about. It’s not as if mind-dependence concerns metaphysical constitution by the mental, rather than reduction. Certainly advocates of the view that wrongness is constituted by disapproval disagree on some points with those who think that wrongness reduces to disapproval. But in general they seem to agree on an important point: that the there is some kind of robust metaphysical dependence of wrongness on some mental state. It is our sense that this agreed-upon claim is what is at stake in debates about mind-dependence.