 Contributions to current process-philosophical research typically focus on (aspects of) only one of these three components of a theory  revision.[3]  More often than not, however, the larger purpose of the contribution remains implicit, which is one of the reasons why contemporary process philosophy, especially non-Whiteheadian process thought, does not clearly stand out as a unified effort at theory revision. Process philosophy currently presents itself as an internally diversified, geographically and disciplinarily distributed phenomenon of innovative thought in Western philosophy. Accordingly, there are significant differences in how process philosophers approach claims (1)–(3). In the following the focus will be on arguments for claims (1)–(3) within contemporary analytical process philosophy. The reader should thus keep in mind that the pointers set in the following sections are partially representative at best and need to be supplemented by introductions to, e.g., contemporary  Whiteheadian  process thought and French process thought  (Gilles Deleuze,  Alain Badiou). In addition, pointers to process-philosophical contributions to the philosophy of religion are all but omitted, since extensive and in-depth treatments are provided in the entries on  Charles Hartshorne  and  process theism.