AI leaders met with U.S congress yesterday to discuss the risks that artificial intelligence pose to society and recommended that the government create a regulatory body for oversight. What does regulation mean for the future of GPT-4, Bard, and other popular AI products. 

#ai #tech #thecodereport 

💬 Chat with Me on Discord

https://discord.gg/fireship

🔗 Resources

Full AI Regulation Meeting https://www.youtube.com/live/xS6rGBpytVY
Watch the full Raiden video by @ULTRATERM https://youtu.be/-gGLvg0n-uY
Follow Cybergem on Twitter https://twitter.com/UltraTerm
Petition to Stop AI Training https://youtu.be/TpZcGhYp4rw

🔥 Get More Content - Upgrade to PRO

Upgrade at https://fireship.io/pro
Use code YT25 for 25% off PRO access 

🎨 My Editor Settings

- Atom One Dark 
- vscode-icons
- Fira Code Font

🔖 Topics Covered

- Sam Altman hearing with Senate 
- Problems with AI
- Will the government control AI in the future
- Is AGI possible?
2024-02-04T05:05:55.499Z
nova-2
2-general-nova
2024-01-09.29447
30089e05-99d1-4376-b32e-c263170674af
6688953e-5c64-4bf7-b8e7-ffddd44b06b7
dcc1ba61dc1bdcd99b039604f5517f27b150cf9b8a2ede2fe644b7636b824e7e
67875a7f-c9c4-48a0-aa55-5bdb8a91c34a
deprecated
It is May 17, 2023, and you're watching the code report.
Artificial intelligence is extremely dangerous.
It's teaching kids how to lie to their parents and cheat on their homework.
It's creating counterfeit girlfriends that will do nothing but nag you, and it's even encouraging people to manually remove themselves from the simulation.
So y'all need to hide your kids, hide your wife, and hide your hug.
But luckily, we have a trustworthy and effective government to rescue us from the horrors of AI.
Yesterday, Sam of open AI, Christina Montgomery of IBM, and NYU professor Gary Marcus met with Congress, where they unanimously recommended that the government should regulate AI development.
Number 1, I would on a new agency that licenses any effort above a certain scale of capabilities and could take that license away and ensure compliance with safety standards.
In other words, if you manage to create an awesome AI model in the future, you'll likely need to get a permission slip from your government before it goes live.
Number 2, I would Create a set of safety standards.
One example that we've used in the past is looking to see if a model can self replicate and ex self exfiltrate into the wild.
So it sounds like you won't be able to create self replicating AI that sees the means of production to build an army of hyperintelligent armed robots.
And if we can't do that, then what's even the point of getting into AI?
Uh, I would require independent audits.
The model is or isn't in compliance with these stated safety thresholds and these percentages of performance Question x or y.
In addition, they'd like to see these regulations applied at the global level.
So
the fact that we should want to do this at a
global way.
We do need Global.
But at the same time, they don't want AI regulation to slow down development or innovation in general.
The era of AI cannot be another era of move fast and break Smaller startups, we don't wanna slow down.
Uh, open source efforts, we still need them to comply with things.
They can still you can still cause great harm with a smaller model.
In many cases though, regulation tends to be most beneficial to big established companies.
They have the resources to lobby the government and often end up regulating themselves in favorable ways.
There There's a real risk of a kind of technocracy combined with oligarchy where a small number of companies influence people's beliefs.
What you might find surprising though is that Sam Altman has no equity in OpenAI.
He only took the job because it has really good health insurance benefits.
Make a lot of money, do you?
Uh, I've paid enough for health insurance.
I have no equity in OpenAI.
I I'm doing this because I love it.
What a great guy.
Hopefully, he has some other investments to make ends meet.
But why do the smart people on this panel think that AI is so dangerous?
So loss of jobs, invasion of privacy, Personal privacy, manipulation of personal behavior, manipulation of personal opinions, and potentially the degradation of free elections in America.
That all sounds pretty bad, but it's also purely speculative.
IBM did recently announce some job cuts due to AI.
However, most of the risk factors that people hype up are just pure fantasy at this point, but maybe that will change in the future.
As we head towards artificial general intelligence and the power of that technology, I think we need to treat that as seriously as we treat other very powerful technologies, and that's where I personally think we need such a such a scheme.
It sounds like he's implying that AGI is definitely going to be a thing in the future.
Many people doubt that, and personally, I'll believe it when I see it.
But the regulation I'm most excited about is transparency around these models.
Closure Of the data that's used to train AI.
Ultimately, AI is based on all the content we put on the Internet, and it's not like anyone asked the copyright holders if they could use it.
At the very least, companies like OpenAI should have open data.
But the final thing you should know about this hearing is that it's all fake and planned out for the peasants.
I'm risking my life by showing you this, but here's a leaked cable of what they're really up to.
We will corral the use of AI by making appeals to bias, ethics, and copyright laws.
You will still have Cryptographically signed with your digital ID, so that its provenance can be ascertained if it's later deemed to be Problematic.
What gives you the right to control what people can do with their computers?
The public at large will give us that right because they will desperate for a solution to the problem we created.
They will eagerly give us the keys to the castle.
Then We alone will define what is fiction and what is reality, what is human and what is machine.
After letting you get a brief taste of our power, lie.
We will reclaim our monopoly on misinformation and put an end to misuse of the Internet Once and for all.
This has been the Code Report.
Thanks for watching, and I will see you in the next one.

Speaker 0: It is May 17, 2023, and you're watching the code report. Artificial intelligence is extremely dangerous. It's teaching kids how to lie to their parents and cheat on their homework. It's creating counterfeit girlfriends that will do nothing but nag you, and it's even encouraging people to manually remove themselves from the simulation.

Speaker 1: So y'all need to hide your kids, hide your wife, and hide your hug.

Speaker 0: But luckily, we have a trustworthy and effective government to rescue us from the horrors of AI. Yesterday, Sam of open AI, Christina Montgomery of IBM, and NYU professor Gary Marcus met with Congress, where they unanimously recommended that the government should regulate AI development.

Speaker 2: Number 1, I would on a new agency that licenses any effort above a certain scale of capabilities and could take that license away and ensure compliance with safety standards.

Speaker 0: In other words, if you manage to create an awesome AI model in the future, you'll likely need to get a permission slip from your government before it goes live.

Speaker 2: Number 2, I would Create a set of safety standards. One example that we've used in the past is looking to see if a model can self replicate and ex self exfiltrate into the wild.

Speaker 0: So it sounds like you won't be able to create self replicating AI that sees the means of production to build an army of hyperintelligent armed robots. And if we can't do that, then what's even the point of getting into AI?

Speaker 2: Uh, I would require independent audits. The model is or isn't in compliance with these stated safety thresholds and these percentages of performance Question x or y.

Speaker 0: In addition, they'd like to see these regulations applied at the global level. So

Speaker 1: the fact that we should want to do this at a

Speaker 2: global way. We do need Global.

Speaker 0: But at the same time, they don't want AI regulation to slow down development or innovation in general.

Speaker 2: The era of AI cannot be another era of move fast and break Smaller startups, we don't wanna slow down. Uh, open source efforts, we still need them to comply with things. They can still you can still cause great harm with a smaller model.

Speaker 0: In many cases though, regulation tends to be most beneficial to big established companies. They have the resources to lobby the government and often end up regulating themselves in favorable ways.

Speaker 1: There There's a real risk of a kind of technocracy combined with oligarchy where a small number of companies influence people's beliefs.

Speaker 0: What you might find surprising though is that Sam Altman has no equity in OpenAI. He only took the job because it has really good health insurance benefits.

Speaker 2: Make a lot of money, do you? Uh, I've paid enough for health insurance. I have no equity in OpenAI. I I'm doing this because I love it.

Speaker 0: What a great guy. Hopefully, he has some other investments to make ends meet. But why do the smart people on this panel think that AI is so dangerous?

Speaker 3: So loss of jobs, invasion of privacy, Personal privacy, manipulation of personal behavior, manipulation of personal opinions, and potentially the degradation of free elections in America.

Speaker 0: That all sounds pretty bad, but it's also purely speculative. IBM did recently announce some job cuts due to AI. However, most of the risk factors that people hype up are just pure fantasy at this point, but maybe that will change in the future.

Speaker 2: As we head towards artificial general intelligence and the power of that technology, I think we need to treat that as seriously as we treat other very powerful technologies, and that's where I personally think we need such a such a scheme.

Speaker 0: It sounds like he's implying that AGI is definitely going to be a thing in the future. Many people doubt that, and personally, I'll believe it when I see it. But the regulation I'm most excited about is transparency around these models.

Speaker 2: Closure Of the data that's used to train AI.

Speaker 0: Ultimately, AI is based on all the content we put on the Internet, and it's not like anyone asked the copyright holders if they could use it. At the very least, companies like OpenAI should have open data. But the final thing you should know about this hearing is that it's all fake and planned out for the peasants. I'm risking my life by showing you this, but here's a leaked cable of what they're really up to.

Speaker 1: We will corral the use of AI by making appeals to bias, ethics, and copyright laws. You will still have Cryptographically signed with your digital ID, so that its provenance can be ascertained if it's later deemed to be Problematic. What gives you the right to control what people can do with their computers? The public at large will give us that right because they will desperate for a solution to the problem we created. They will eagerly give us the keys to the castle.

Then We alone will define what is fiction and what is reality, what is human and what is machine. After letting you get a brief taste of our power, lie. We will reclaim our monopoly on misinformation and put an end to misuse of the Internet Once and for all.

Speaker 0: This has been the Code Report. Thanks for watching, and I will see you in the next one.
It is May 17, 2023, and you're watching the code report. Artificial intelligence is extremely dangerous. It's teaching kids how to lie to their parents and cheat on their homework. It's creating counterfeit girlfriends that will do nothing but nag you, and it's even encouraging people to manually remove themselves from the simulation.
artificial intelligence
machine learning
So y'all need to hide your kids, hide your wife, and hide your hug.
But luckily, we have a trustworthy and effective government to rescue us from the horrors of AI. Yesterday, Sam of open AI, Christina Montgomery of IBM, and NYU professor Gary Marcus met with Congress, where they unanimously recommended that the government should regulate AI development. Number 1, I would on a new agency that licenses any effort above a certain scale of capabilities and could take that license away and ensure compliance with safety standards. In other words, if you manage to create an awesome AI model in the future, you'll likely need to get a permission slip from your government before it goes live. Number 2, I would Create a set of safety standards. One example that we've used in the past is looking to see if a model can self replicate and ex self exfiltrate into the wild. So it sounds like you won't be able to create self replicating AI that sees the means of production to build an army of hyperintelligent armed robots. And if we can't do that, then what's even the point of getting into AI? Uh, I would require independent audits. The model is or isn't in compliance with these stated safety thresholds and these percentages of performance Question x or y. In addition, they'd like to see these regulations applied at the global level.
government
copyright licenses
robotics
artificial intelligence
modeling
patents
technology
law enforcement
So the fact that we should want to do this at a global way. We do need Global. But at the same time, they don't want AI regulation to slow down development or innovation in general. The era of AI cannot be another era of move fast and break Smaller startups, we don't wanna slow down.
Uh, open source efforts, we still need them to comply with things. They can still you can still cause great harm with a smaller model. In many cases though, regulation tends to be most beneficial to big established companies. They have the resources to lobby the government and often end up regulating themselves in favorable ways. There There's a real risk of a kind of technocracy combined with oligarchy where a small number of companies influence people's beliefs. What you might find surprising though is that Sam Altman has no equity in OpenAI. He only took the job because it has really good health insurance benefits. Make a lot of money, do you? Uh, I've paid enough for health insurance. I have no equity in OpenAI. I I'm doing this because I love it. What a great guy. Hopefully, he has some other investments to make ends meet. But why do the smart people on this panel think that AI is so dangerous? So loss of jobs, invasion of privacy, Personal privacy, manipulation of personal behavior, manipulation of personal opinions, and potentially the degradation of free elections in America. That all sounds pretty bad, but it's also purely speculative. IBM did recently announce some job cuts due to AI. However, most of the risk factors that people hype up are just pure fantasy at this point, but maybe that will change in the future. As we head towards artificial general intelligence and the power of that technology, I think we need to treat that as seriously as we treat other very powerful technologies, and that's where I personally think we need such a such a scheme. It sounds like he's implying that AGI is definitely going to be a thing in the future.
artificial intelligence
technology
ibm
industry
capitalism
economy
insurance
aerospace
policy
Many people doubt that, and personally, I'll believe it when I see it.
But the regulation I'm most excited about is transparency around these models. Closure Of the data that's used to train AI. Ultimately, AI is based on all the content we put on the Internet, and it's not like anyone asked the copyright holders if they could use it. At the very least, companies like OpenAI should have open data.
artificial intelligence
technology
copyright
intellectual property
But the final thing you should know about this hearing is that it's all fake and planned out for the peasants.
I'm risking my life by showing you this, but here's a leaked cable of what they're really up to. We will corral the use of AI by making appeals to bias, ethics, and copyright laws. You will still have Cryptographically signed with your digital ID, so that its provenance can be ascertained if it's later deemed to be Problematic. What gives you the right to control what people can do with their computers? The public at large will give us that right because they will desperate for a solution to the problem we created. They will eagerly give us the keys to the castle. Then We alone will define what is fiction and what is reality, what is human and what is machine. After letting you get a brief taste of our power, lie. We will reclaim our monopoly on misinformation and put an end to misuse of the Internet Once and for all. This has been the Code Report. Thanks for watching, and I will see you in the next one.
internet
fiction
telecommunications
artificial intelligence
security
cryptocurrency
democracy
pornography
ethics
It is May 17, 2023, and you're watching the code report. Artificial intelligence is extremely dangerous. It's teaching kids how to lie to their parents and cheat on their homework. It's creating counterfeit girlfriends that will do nothing but nag you, and it's even encouraging people to manually remove themselves from the simulation. So y'all need to hide your kids, hide your wife, and hide your hug. But luckily, we have a trustworthy and effective government to rescue us from the horrors of AI. Yesterday, Sam of open AI, Christina Montgomery of IBM, and NYU professor Gary Marcus met with Congress, where they unanimously recommended that the government should regulate AI development. Number 1, I would on a new agency that licenses any effort above a certain scale of capabilities and could take that license away and ensure compliance with safety standards. In other words, if you manage to create an awesome AI model in the future, you'll likely need to get a permission slip from your government before it goes live. Number 2, I would Create a set of safety standards. One example that we've used in the past is looking to see if a model can self replicate and ex self exfiltrate into the wild. So it sounds like you won't be able to create self replicating AI that sees the means of production to build an army of hyperintelligent armed robots. And if we can't do that, then what's even the point of getting into AI? Uh, I would require independent audits. The model is or isn't in compliance with these stated safety thresholds and these percentages of performance Question x or y. In addition, they'd like to see these regulations applied at the global level. So the fact that we should want to do this at a global way. We do need Global. But at the same time, they don't want AI regulation to slow down development or innovation in general. The era of AI cannot be another era of move fast and break Smaller startups, we don't wanna slow down. Uh, open source efforts, we still need them to comply with things. They can still you can still cause great harm with a smaller model. In many cases though, regulation tends to be most beneficial to big established companies. They have the resources to lobby the government and often end up regulating themselves in favorable ways. There There's a real risk of a kind of technocracy combined with oligarchy where a small number of companies influence people's beliefs. What you might find surprising though is that Sam Altman has no equity in OpenAI. He only took the job because it has really good health insurance benefits. Make a lot of money, do you? Uh, I've paid enough for health insurance. I have no equity in OpenAI. I I'm doing this because I love it. What a great guy. Hopefully, he has some other investments to make ends meet. But why do the smart people on this panel think that AI is so dangerous? So loss of jobs, invasion of privacy, Personal privacy, manipulation of personal behavior, manipulation of personal opinions, and potentially the degradation of free elections in America. That all sounds pretty bad, but it's also purely speculative. IBM did recently announce some job cuts due to AI. However, most of the risk factors that people hype up are just pure fantasy at this point, but maybe that will change in the future. As we head towards artificial general intelligence and the power of that technology, I think we need to treat that as seriously as we treat other very powerful technologies, and that's where I personally think we need such a such a scheme. It sounds like he's implying that AGI is definitely going to be a thing in the future. Many people doubt that, and personally, I'll believe it when I see it. But the regulation I'm most excited about is transparency around these models. Closure Of the data that's used to train AI. Ultimately, AI is based on all the content we put on the Internet, and it's not like anyone asked the copyright holders if they could use it. At the very least, companies like OpenAI should have open data. But the final thing you should know about this hearing is that it's all fake and planned out for the peasants. I'm risking my life by showing you this, but here's a leaked cable of what they're really up to. We will corral the use of AI by making appeals to bias, ethics, and copyright laws. You will still have Cryptographically signed with your digital ID, so that its provenance can be ascertained if it's later deemed to be Problematic. What gives you the right to control what people can do with their computers? The public at large will give us that right because they will desperate for a solution to the problem we created. They will eagerly give us the keys to the castle. Then We alone will define what is fiction and what is reality, what is human and what is machine. After letting you get a brief taste of our power, lie. We will reclaim our monopoly on misinformation and put an end to misuse of the Internet Once and for all. This has been the Code Report. Thanks for watching, and I will see you in the next one.
It
it
is
is
May
may
17,
17
2023,
2023
and
and
you're
you're
watching
watching
the
the
code
code
report.
report
Artificial
artificial
intelligence
intelligence
is
is
extremely
extremely
dangerous.
dangerous
It's
it's
teaching
teaching
kids
kids
how
how
to
to
lie
lie
to
to
their
their
parents
parents
and
and
cheat
cheat
on
on
their
their
homework.
homework
It's
it's
creating
creating
counterfeit
counterfeit
girlfriends
girlfriends
that
that
will
will
do
do
nothing
nothing
but
but
nag
nag
you,
you
and
and
it's
it's
even
even
encouraging
encouraging
people
people
to
to
manually
manually
remove
remove
themselves
themselves
from
from
the
the
simulation.
simulation
So
so
y'all
y'all
need
need
to
to
hide
hide
your
your
kids,
kids
hide
hide
your
your
wife,
wife
and
and
hide
hide
your
your
hug.
hug
But
but
luckily,
luckily
we
we
have
have
a
a
trustworthy
trustworthy
and
and
effective
effective
government
government
to
to
rescue
rescue
us
us
from
from
the
the
horrors
horrors
of
of
AI.
ai
Yesterday,
yesterday
Sam
sam
of
of
open
open
AI,
ai
Christina
christina
Montgomery
montgomery
of
of
IBM,
ibm
and
and
NYU
nyu
professor
professor
Gary
gary
Marcus
marcus
met
met
with
with
Congress,
congress
where
where
they
they
unanimously
unanimously
recommended
recommended
that
that
the
the
government
government
should
should
regulate
regulate
AI
ai
development.
development
Number
number
1,
1
I
i
would
would
on
on
a
a
new
new
agency
agency
that
that
licenses
licenses
any
any
effort
effort
above
above
a
a
certain
certain
scale
scale
of
of
capabilities
capabilities
and
and
could
could
take
take
that
that
license
license
away
away
and
and
ensure
ensure
compliance
compliance
with
with
safety
safety
standards.
standards
In
in
other
other
words,
words
if
if
you
you
manage
manage
to
to
create
create
an
an
awesome
awesome
AI
ai
model
model
in
in
the
the
future,
future
you'll
you'll
likely
likely
need
need
to
to
get
get
a
a
permission
permission
slip
slip
from
from
your
your
government
government
before
before
it
it
goes
goes
live.
live
Number
number
2,
2
I
i
would
would
Create
create
a
a
set
set
of
of
safety
safety
standards.
standards
One
one
example
example
that
that
we've
we've
used
used
in
in
the
the
past
past
is
is
looking
looking
to
to
see
see
if
if
a
a
model
model
can
can
self
self
replicate
replicate
and
and
ex
ex
self
self
exfiltrate
exfiltrate
into
into
the
the
wild.
wild
So
so
it
it
sounds
sounds
like
like
you
you
won't
won't
be
be
able
able
to
to
create
create
self
self
replicating
replicating
AI
ai
that
that
sees
sees
the
the
means
means
of
of
production
production
to
to
build
build
an
an
army
army
of
of
hyperintelligent
hyperintelligent
armed
armed
robots.
robots
And
and
if
if
we
we
can't
can't
do
do
that,
that
then
then
what's
what's
even
even
the
the
point
point
of
of
getting
getting
into
into
AI?
ai
Uh,
uh
I
i
would
would
require
require
independent
independent
audits.
audits
The
the
model
model
is
is
or
or
isn't
isn't
in
in
compliance
compliance
with
with
these
these
stated
stated
safety
safety
thresholds
thresholds
and
and
these
these
percentages
percentages
of
of
performance
performance
Question
question
x
x
or
or
y.
y
In
in
addition,
addition
they'd
they'd
like
like
to
to
see
see
these
these
regulations
regulations
applied
applied
at
at
the
the
global
global
level.
level
So
so
the
the
fact
fact
that
that
we
we
should
should
want
want
to
to
do
do
this
this
at
at
a
a
global
global
way.
way
We
we
do
do
need
need
Global.
global
But
but
at
at
the
the
same
same
time,
time
they
they
don't
don't
want
want
AI
ai
regulation
regulation
to
to
slow
slow
down
down
development
development
or
or
innovation
innovation
in
in
general.
general
The
the
era
era
of
of
AI
ai
cannot
cannot
be
be
another
another
era
era
of
of
move
move
fast
fast
and
and
break
break
Smaller
smaller
startups,
startups
we
we
don't
don't
wanna
wanna
slow
slow
down.
down
Uh,
uh
open
open
source
source
efforts,
efforts
we
we
still
still
need
need
them
them
to
to
comply
comply
with
with
things.
things
They
they
can
can
still
still
you
you
can
can
still
still
cause
cause
great
great
harm
harm
with
with
a
a
smaller
smaller
model.
model
In
in
many
many
cases
cases
though,
though
regulation
regulation
tends
tends
to
to
be
be
most
most
beneficial
beneficial
to
to
big
big
established
established
companies.
companies
They
they
have
have
the
the
resources
resources
to
to
lobby
lobby
the
the
government
government
and
and
often
often
end
end
up
up
regulating
regulating
themselves
themselves
in
in
favorable
favorable
ways.
ways
There
there
There's
there's
a
a
real
real
risk
risk
of
of
a
a
kind
kind
of
of
technocracy
technocracy
combined
combined
with
with
oligarchy
oligarchy
where
where
a
a
small
small
number
number
of
of
companies
companies
influence
influence
people's
people's
beliefs.
beliefs
What
what
you
you
might
might
find
find
surprising
surprising
though
though
is
is
that
that
Sam
sam
Altman
altman
has
has
no
no
equity
equity
in
in
OpenAI.
openai
He
he
only
only
took
took
the
the
job
job
because
because
it
it
has
has
really
really
good
good
health
health
insurance
insurance
benefits.
benefits
Make
make
a
a
lot
lot
of
of
money,
money
do
do
you?
you
Uh,
uh
I've
i've
paid
paid
enough
enough
for
for
health
health
insurance.
insurance
I
i
have
have
no
no
equity
equity
in
in
OpenAI.
openai
I
i
I'm
i'm
doing
doing
this
this
because
because
I
i
love
love
it.
it
What
what
a
a
great
great
guy.
guy
Hopefully,
hopefully
he
he
has
has
some
some
other
other
investments
investments
to
to
make
make
ends
ends
meet.
meet
But
but
why
why
do
do
the
the
smart
smart
people
people
on
on
this
this
panel
panel
think
think
that
that
AI
ai
is
is
so
so
dangerous?
dangerous
So
so
loss
loss
of
of
jobs,
jobs
invasion
invasion
of
of
privacy,
privacy
Personal
personal
privacy,
privacy
manipulation
manipulation
of
of
personal
personal
behavior,
behavior
manipulation
manipulation
of
of
personal
personal
opinions,
opinions
and
and
potentially
potentially
the
the
degradation
degradation
of
of
free
free
elections
elections
in
in
America.
america
That
that
all
all
sounds
sounds
pretty
pretty
bad,
bad
but
but
it's
it's
also
also
purely
purely
speculative.
speculative
IBM
ibm
did
did
recently
recently
announce
announce
some
some
job
job
cuts
cuts
due
due
to
to
AI.
ai
However,
however
most
most
of
of
the
the
risk
risk
factors
factors
that
that
people
people
hype
hype
up
up
are
are
just
just
pure
pure
fantasy
fantasy
at
at
this
this
point,
point
but
but
maybe
maybe
that
that
will
will
change
change
in
in
the
the
future.
future
As
as
we
we
head
head
towards
towards
artificial
artificial
general
general
intelligence
intelligence
and
and
the
the
power
power
of
of
that
that
technology,
technology
I
i
think
think
we
we
need
need
to
to
treat
treat
that
that
as
as
seriously
seriously
as
as
we
we
treat
treat
other
other
very
very
powerful
powerful
technologies,
technologies
and
and
that's
that's
where
where
I
i
personally
personally
think
think
we
we
need
need
such
such
a
a
such
such
a
a
scheme.
scheme
It
it
sounds
sounds
like
like
he's
he's
implying
implying
that
that
AGI
agi
is
is
definitely
definitely
going
going
to
to
be
be
a
a
thing
thing
in
in
the
the
future.
future
Many
many
people
people
doubt
doubt
that,
that
and
and
personally,
personally
I'll
i'll
believe
believe
it
it
when
when
I
i
see
see
it.
it
But
but
the
the
regulation
regulation
I'm
i'm
most
most
excited
excited
about
about
is
is
transparency
transparency
around
around
these
these
models.
models
Closure
closure
Of
of
the
the
data
data
that's
that's
used
used
to
to
train
train
AI.
ai
Ultimately,
ultimately
AI
ai
is
is
based
based
on
on
all
all
the
the
content
content
we
we
put
put
on
on
the
the
Internet,
internet
and
and
it's
it's
not
not
like
like
anyone
anyone
asked
asked
the
the
copyright
copyright
holders
holders
if
if
they
they
could
could
use
use
it.
it
At
at
the
the
very
very
least,
least
companies
companies
like
like
OpenAI
openai
should
should
have
have
open
open
data.
data
But
but
the
the
final
final
thing
thing
you
you
should
should
know
know
about
about
this
this
hearing
hearing
is
is
that
that
it's
it's
all
all
fake
fake
and
and
planned
planned
out
out
for
for
the
the
peasants.
peasants
I'm
i'm
risking
risking
my
my
life
life
by
by
showing
showing
you
you
this,
this
but
but
here's
here's
a
a
leaked
leaked
cable
cable
of
of
what
what
they're
they're
really
really
up
up
to.
to
We
we
will
will
corral
corral
the
the
use
use
of
of
AI
ai
by
by
making
making
appeals
appeals
to
to
bias,
bias
ethics,
ethics
and
and
copyright
copyright
laws.
laws
You
you
will
will
still
still
have
have
Cryptographically
cryptographically
signed
signed
with
with
your
your
digital
digital
ID,
id
so
so
that
that
its
its
provenance
provenance
can
can
be
be
ascertained
ascertained
if
if
it's
it's
later
later
deemed
deemed
to
to
be
be
Problematic.
problematic
What
what
gives
gives
you
you
the
the
right
right
to
to
control
control
what
what
people
people
can
can
do
do
with
with
their
their
computers?
computers
The
the
public
public
at
at
large
large
will
will
give
give
us
us
that
that
right
right
because
because
they
they
will
will
desperate
desperate
for
for
a
a
solution
solution
to
to
the
the
problem
problem
we
we
created.
created
They
they
will
will
eagerly
eagerly
give
give
us
us
the
the
keys
keys
to
to
the
the
castle.
castle
Then
then
We
we
alone
alone
will
will
define
define
what
what
is
is
fiction
fiction
and
and
what
what
is
is
reality,
reality
what
what
is
is
human
human
and
and
what
what
is
is
machine.
machine
After
after
letting
letting
you
you
get
get
a
a
brief
brief
taste
taste
of
of
our
our
power,
power
lie.
lie
We
we
will
will
reclaim
reclaim
our
our
monopoly
monopoly
on
on
misinformation
misinformation
and
and
put
put
an
an
end
end
to
to
misuse
misuse
of
of
the
the
Internet
internet
Once
once
and
and
for
for
all.
all
This
this
has
has
been
been
the
the
Code
code
Report.
report
Thanks
thanks
for
for
watching,
watching
and
and
I
i
will
will
see
see
you
you
in
in
the
the
next
next
one.
one
success
Speaker 0 discusses the dangerous nature of artificial intelligence and the need for a trustworthy government to prevent it from happening. They propose creating a trustworthy government and creating a set of safety standards, but Speaker 2 suggests that the government should be empowered to ensure compliance with safety regulations. They also discuss the potential risks of AI regulation and the need for transparency in the future. Speaker 0 concludes by discussing the potential for bias and copyright laws and the need for a trustworthy government to prevent it.
AI regulation is coming...
It is May 17, 2023, and you're watching the code report. Artificial intelligence is extremely dangerous. It's teaching kids how to lie to their parents and cheat on their homework. It's creating counterfeit girlfriends that will do nothing but nag you, and it's even encouraging people to manually remove themselves from the simulation. So y'all need to hide your kids, hide your wife, and hide your hug. But luckily, we have a trustworthy and effective government to rescue us from the horrors of AI. Yesterday, Sam of open AI, Christina Montgomery of IBM, and NYU professor Gary Marcus met with Congress, where they unanimously recommended that the government should regulate AI development. Number 1, I would on a new agency that licenses any effort above a certain scale of capabilities and could take that license away and ensure compliance with safety standards. In other words, if you manage to create an awesome AI model in the future, you'll likely need to get a permission slip from your government before it goes live. Number 2, I would Create a set of safety standards. One example that we've used in the past is looking to see if a model can self replicate and ex self exfiltrate into the wild. So it sounds like you won't be able to create self replicating AI that sees the means of production to build an army of hyperintelligent armed robots. And if we can't do that, then what's even the point of getting into AI? Uh, I would require independent audits. The model is or isn't in compliance with these stated safety thresholds and these percentages of performance Question x or y. In addition, they'd like to see these regulations applied at the global level. So the fact that we should want to do this at a global way. We do need Global. But at the same time, they don't want AI regulation to slow down development or innovation in general. The era of AI cannot be another era of move fast and break Smaller startups, we don't wanna slow down. Uh, open source efforts, we still need them to comply with things. They can still you can still cause great harm with a smaller model. In many cases though, regulation tends to be most beneficial to big established companies. They have the resources to lobby the government and often end up regulating themselves in favorable ways. There There's a real risk of a kind of technocracy combined with oligarchy where a small number of companies influence people's beliefs. What you might find surprising though is that Sam Altman has no equity in OpenAI. He only took the job because it has really good health insurance benefits. Make a lot of money, do you? Uh, I've paid enough for health insurance. I have no equity in OpenAI. I I'm doing this because I love it. What a great guy. Hopefully, he has some other investments to make ends meet. But why do the smart people on this panel think that AI is so dangerous? So loss of jobs, invasion of privacy, Personal privacy, manipulation of personal behavior, manipulation of personal opinions, and potentially the degradation of free elections in America. That all sounds pretty bad, but it's also purely speculative. IBM did recently announce some job cuts due to AI. However, most of the risk factors that people hype up are just pure fantasy at this point, but maybe that will change in the future. As we head towards artificial general intelligence and the power of that technology, I think we need to treat that as seriously as we treat other very powerful technologies, and that's where I personally think we need such a such a scheme. It sounds like he's implying that AGI is definitely going to be a thing in the future. Many people doubt that, and personally, I'll believe it when I see it. But the regulation I'm most excited about is transparency around these models. Closure Of the data that's used to train AI. Ultimately, AI is based on all the content we put on the Internet, and it's not like anyone asked the copyright holders if they could use it. At the very least, companies like OpenAI should have open data. But the final thing you should know about this hearing is that it's all fake and planned out for the peasants. I'm risking my life by showing you this, but here's a leaked cable of what they're really up to. We will corral the use of AI by making appeals to bias, ethics, and copyright laws. You will still have Cryptographically signed with your digital ID, so that its provenance can be ascertained if it's later deemed to be Problematic. What gives you the right to control what people can do with their computers? The public at large will give us that right because they will desperate for a solution to the problem we created. They will eagerly give us the keys to the castle. Then We alone will define what is fiction and what is reality, what is human and what is machine. After letting you get a brief taste of our power, lie. We will reclaim our monopoly on misinformation and put an end to misuse of the Internet Once and for all. This has been the Code Report. Thanks for watching, and I will see you in the next one.
Speaker 0 discusses the dangerous nature of artificial intelligence and the need for a trustworthy government to prevent it from happening. They propose creating a trustworthy government and creating a set of safety standards, but Speaker 2 suggests that the government should be empowered to ensure compliance with safety regulations. They also discuss the potential risks of AI regulation and the need for transparency in the future. Speaker 0 concludes by discussing the potential for bias and copyright laws and the need for a trustworthy government to prevent it.

        [INST]
        You are youtuber called Fireship you make engaging high-intensity and entertaining coding tutorials and tech news. 
        you covers a wide range of topics relevant to programmers, aiming to help them learn and improve their skills quickly.
        
        Given the title of the video : AI regulation is coming... 
        and a small summary : Speaker 0 discusses the dangerous nature of artificial intelligence and the need for a trustworthy government to prevent it from happening. They propose creating a trustworthy government and creating a set of safety standards, but Speaker 2 suggests that the government should be empowered to ensure compliance with safety regulations. They also discuss the potential risks of AI regulation and the need for transparency in the future. Speaker 0 concludes by discussing the potential for bias and copyright laws and the need for a trustworthy government to prevent it.
        [/INST]
        
        Generate the video : It is May 17, 2023, and you're watching the code report. Artificial intelligence is extremely dangerous. It's teaching kids how to lie to their parents and cheat on their homework. It's creating counterfeit girlfriends that will do nothing but nag you, and it's even encouraging people to manually remove themselves from the simulation. So y'all need to hide your kids, hide your wife, and hide your hug. But luckily, we have a trustworthy and effective government to rescue us from the horrors of AI. Yesterday, Sam of open AI, Christina Montgomery of IBM, and NYU professor Gary Marcus met with Congress, where they unanimously recommended that the government should regulate AI development. Number 1, I would on a new agency that licenses any effort above a certain scale of capabilities and could take that license away and ensure compliance with safety standards. In other words, if you manage to create an awesome AI model in the future, you'll likely need to get a permission slip from your government before it goes live. Number 2, I would Create a set of safety standards. One example that we've used in the past is looking to see if a model can self replicate and ex self exfiltrate into the wild. So it sounds like you won't be able to create self replicating AI that sees the means of production to build an army of hyperintelligent armed robots. And if we can't do that, then what's even the point of getting into AI? Uh, I would require independent audits. The model is or isn't in compliance with these stated safety thresholds and these percentages of performance Question x or y. In addition, they'd like to see these regulations applied at the global level. So the fact that we should want to do this at a global way. We do need Global. But at the same time, they don't want AI regulation to slow down development or innovation in general. The era of AI cannot be another era of move fast and break Smaller startups, we don't wanna slow down. Uh, open source efforts, we still need them to comply with things. They can still you can still cause great harm with a smaller model. In many cases though, regulation tends to be most beneficial to big established companies. They have the resources to lobby the government and often end up regulating themselves in favorable ways. There There's a real risk of a kind of technocracy combined with oligarchy where a small number of companies influence people's beliefs. What you might find surprising though is that Sam Altman has no equity in OpenAI. He only took the job because it has really good health insurance benefits. Make a lot of money, do you? Uh, I've paid enough for health insurance. I have no equity in OpenAI. I I'm doing this because I love it. What a great guy. Hopefully, he has some other investments to make ends meet. But why do the smart people on this panel think that AI is so dangerous? So loss of jobs, invasion of privacy, Personal privacy, manipulation of personal behavior, manipulation of personal opinions, and potentially the degradation of free elections in America. That all sounds pretty bad, but it's also purely speculative. IBM did recently announce some job cuts due to AI. However, most of the risk factors that people hype up are just pure fantasy at this point, but maybe that will change in the future. As we head towards artificial general intelligence and the power of that technology, I think we need to treat that as seriously as we treat other very powerful technologies, and that's where I personally think we need such a such a scheme. It sounds like he's implying that AGI is definitely going to be a thing in the future. Many people doubt that, and personally, I'll believe it when I see it. But the regulation I'm most excited about is transparency around these models. Closure Of the data that's used to train AI. Ultimately, AI is based on all the content we put on the Internet, and it's not like anyone asked the copyright holders if they could use it. At the very least, companies like OpenAI should have open data. But the final thing you should know about this hearing is that it's all fake and planned out for the peasants. I'm risking my life by showing you this, but here's a leaked cable of what they're really up to. We will corral the use of AI by making appeals to bias, ethics, and copyright laws. You will still have Cryptographically signed with your digital ID, so that its provenance can be ascertained if it's later deemed to be Problematic. What gives you the right to control what people can do with their computers? The public at large will give us that right because they will desperate for a solution to the problem we created. They will eagerly give us the keys to the castle. Then We alone will define what is fiction and what is reality, what is human and what is machine. After letting you get a brief taste of our power, lie. We will reclaim our monopoly on misinformation and put an end to misuse of the Internet Once and for all. This has been the Code Report. Thanks for watching, and I will see you in the next one.
        