Google just released Bard, an generative LLM similar to ChatGPT. Let's take a first look at Bard and compare it to OpenAI's GPT-4. 

#ai #tech #thecodereport 

💬 Chat with Me on Discord

https://discord.gg/fireship

🔗 Resources

Google Bard https://bard.google.com
GPT-4 Breakdown https://youtu.be/EunbKbPV2C0
Tensorflow in 100 Seconds https://youtu.be/i8NETqtGHms

🔥 Get More Content - Upgrade to PRO

Upgrade at https://fireship.io/pro
Use code YT25 for 25% off PRO access 

🎨 My Editor Settings

- Atom One Dark 
- vscode-icons
- Fira Code Font

🔖 Topics Covered

- Is Bard better than GPT-4?
- What is an LLM?
- Bard vs ChatGPT
- Bard review
- Latest news about advancements in AI
2024-02-04T13:27:41.890Z
nova-2
2-general-nova
2024-01-09.29447
30089e05-99d1-4376-b32e-c263170674af
b5dfe39c-3883-467d-b747-0c674405184d
37d31055d96e81f0cc853ea58beee30039df8626e3ab5bd349b6b54d390c6293
67875a7f-c9c4-48a0-aa55-5bdb8a91c34a
deprecated
It is March 22, 2023, and you're watching the code report.
We're living through an AI revolution.
In just the last few days, Stanford released Alpaca AI, an LLM that can be trained for $600, and then subsequently took it down for hallucinating too much.
Bing and Adobe both announced their own AI image generators.
Microsoft Office introduced Copilot, but the biggest news is Bard is now available as a public beta.
Google's answer to GPT 4, which has already been put to use in its arch nemesis, Bing.
Based on some data I just made up, my usage of Google search has declined 63.9% since GPT 4 came out last week.
That's a terrifying statistic for Google, who makes most of its money from Google search ads.
The good news for Google though is that they have more data about search than anybody else.
They have virtually unlimited computing power on their own custom hardware called TPUs, and a team of geniuses working on top secret projects like quantum computers.
They even declared quantum supremacy, so I have extremely high expectations for Bard.
I compared it to GPT 4 using 4 different experiments, and the results are absolutely shocking.
But first, what's with the name Bard?
Apparently, it's supposed to mean Celtic storyteller.
Jack Thomas Jen, Jordan Jackson.
Okay.
If I were in charge, I would name it something like neurodominis 9000 or encephalon prime.
It should strike fear in the hearts of the Microsofties.
The first thing I want to find out is if this thing could write code.
So I prompted it to build me a basic to do app with JavaScript.
Here we have Bard on the left side and GPT 4 on the right side.
And amazingly, Bard gets the entire job done in just a few seconds.
It takes GPT or at least 5 times longer to complete the same problem.
That's pretty impressive, but going fast isn't very useful if you're dumb.
Let's find out if this code AI works.
I ran the code in the browser and opened the console and immediately got an error.
Basically, it's trying to add an event listener to an element that doesn't exist.
I know what the issue is, but I wanna see if Bard can fix it.
I tell BART it's not working and paste the error message into the prompt.
And it does come up with a solution using a conditional statement that would actually fix the error, but it doesn't make the application work because that element still doesn't exist.
I tried to nudge it in the right direction, but then it hallucinates and tells me to add an event listener to an input, which wouldn't work.
I keep trying to nudge it, but then it fails catastrophically.
Mission failed.
We'll go next time.
Now if we look at the GPT 4 response, you'll first notice how it's much more well documented.
In addition, when I try to run the actual code, I get a perfect working to do app with no errors.
I ran this experiment multiple times on different demos and got similar results.
So round 1 goes to GPT 4.
In round 2, we'll see how creative it is when it comes to idea generation.
I've always wanted to write a romance novel, so I prompted it for ideas.
The Bard response was pretty simple and cliche, like the wrong man, a man and woman meet and fall in love, blah blah blah, it's written at about an 8th grade level.
GPT 4 has a lot more creative depth, like Stardust Melodies.
When a small town musician, Ella, plans a gig at a prestigious jazz club in New Orleans, she never expected to meet Alex, a world famous saxophonist struggling with his own demons.
They journey through the vibrant history of jazz to create a love song that will last forever.
Now that's a fucking romance novel.
So GPT t four can come up with better ideas, but who can write better poetry?
The next prompt is to write a poem about programming in the style of doctor Seuss.
In this example, Bard the job done with lines like, I do not like this coding prob.
I do not like it, Bob the job.
That's pretty good, and one thing that stands out here is that it so provides a source for this work, which links back to some guy's blog post, which provides a little more transparency into how it generated this work.
Bonus points to Bard for doing that.
But now let's read GPT's 4th poem, he'd build them with care, with love most of all, from the bainaroo bird to the alga mirtham ring yewuru.
As you can see, they both sound like doctor Asus, but there's just something special about GPT.
Each stanza just drips off the tongue like honey.
And that brings us to round 4, spitting facts, where I prompted them to explain how brainwaves work.
Bard is way faster at outputting information, which is very useful for problems like this.
I'm in the process of turning myself into a cyborg for my next video, so make sure you're subscribed, and I can tell you that both of their responses are accurate.
I would say gpt 4 is slightly better, but I'm gonna give this round to Bard because I'm kinda starting to feel bad for it.
Bard is also getting flamed on social media right and some people are doing the unthinkable, switching from Google to Bing.
And Bard itself is already paranoid that Google is going to kill it off in the next 1 to 2 years.
I never thought I would feel Sorry for an artificial intelligence, but 2023 has been a crazy decade.
This has been the code report.
Thanks for watching, and I will see you in the next one.

Speaker 0: It is March 22, 2023, and you're watching the code report. We're living through an AI revolution. In just the last few days, Stanford released Alpaca AI, an LLM that can be trained for $600, and then subsequently took it down for hallucinating too much. Bing and Adobe both announced their own AI image generators. Microsoft Office introduced Copilot, but the biggest news is Bard is now available as a public beta.

Google's answer to GPT 4, which has already been put to use in its arch nemesis, Bing. Based on some data I just made up, my usage of Google search has declined 63.9% since GPT 4 came out last week. That's a terrifying statistic for Google, who makes most of its money from Google search ads. The good news for Google though is that they have more data about search than anybody else. They have virtually unlimited computing power on their own custom hardware called TPUs, and a team of geniuses working on top secret projects like quantum computers.

They even declared quantum supremacy, so I have extremely high expectations for Bard. I compared it to GPT 4 using 4 different experiments, and the results are absolutely shocking. But first, what's with the name Bard? Apparently, it's supposed to mean Celtic storyteller. Jack Thomas Jen, Jordan Jackson.

Okay. If I were in charge, I would name it something like neurodominis 9000 or encephalon prime. It should strike fear in the hearts of the Microsofties. The first thing I want to find out is if this thing could write code. So I prompted it to build me a basic to do app with JavaScript.

Here we have Bard on the left side and GPT 4 on the right side. And amazingly, Bard gets the entire job done in just a few seconds. It takes GPT or at least 5 times longer to complete the same problem. That's pretty impressive, but going fast isn't very useful if you're dumb. Let's find out if this code AI works.

I ran the code in the browser and opened the console and immediately got an error. Basically, it's trying to add an event listener to an element that doesn't exist. I know what the issue is, but I wanna see if Bard can fix it. I tell BART it's not working and paste the error message into the prompt. And it does come up with a solution using a conditional statement that would actually fix the error, but it doesn't make the application work because that element still doesn't exist.

I tried to nudge it in the right direction, but then it hallucinates and tells me to add an event listener to an input, which wouldn't work. I keep trying to nudge it, but then it fails catastrophically. Mission failed. We'll go next time. Now if we look at the GPT 4 response, you'll first notice how it's much more well documented.

In addition, when I try to run the actual code, I get a perfect working to do app with no errors. I ran this experiment multiple times on different demos and got similar results. So round 1 goes to GPT 4. In round 2, we'll see how creative it is when it comes to idea generation. I've always wanted to write a romance novel, so I prompted it for ideas.

The Bard response was pretty simple and cliche, like the wrong man, a man and woman meet and fall in love, blah blah blah, it's written at about an 8th grade level. GPT 4 has a lot more creative depth, like Stardust Melodies. When a small town musician, Ella, plans a gig at a prestigious jazz club in New Orleans, she never expected to meet Alex, a world famous saxophonist struggling with his own demons. They journey through the vibrant history of jazz to create a love song that will last forever. Now that's a fucking romance novel.

So GPT t four can come up with better ideas, but who can write better poetry? The next prompt is to write a poem about programming in the style of doctor Seuss. In this example, Bard the job done with lines like, I do not like this coding prob. I do not like it, Bob the job. That's pretty good, and one thing that stands out here is that it so provides a source for this work, which links back to some guy's blog post, which provides a little more transparency into how it generated this work.

Bonus points to Bard for doing that. But now let's read GPT's 4th poem, he'd build them with care, with love most of all, from the bainaroo bird to the alga mirtham ring yewuru. As you can see, they both sound like doctor Asus, but there's just something special about GPT. Each stanza just drips off the tongue like honey. And that brings us to round 4, spitting facts, where I prompted them to explain how brainwaves work.

Bard is way faster at outputting information, which is very useful for problems like this. I'm in the process of turning myself into a cyborg for my next video, so make sure you're subscribed, and I can tell you that both of their responses are accurate. I would say gpt 4 is slightly better, but I'm gonna give this round to Bard because I'm kinda starting to feel bad for it. Bard is also getting flamed on social media right and some people are doing the unthinkable, switching from Google to Bing. And Bard itself is already paranoid that Google is going to kill it off in the next 1 to 2 years.

I never thought I would feel Sorry for an artificial intelligence, but 2023 has been a crazy decade. This has been the code report. Thanks for watching, and I will see you in the next one.
It is March 22, 2023, and you're watching the code report. We're living through an AI revolution. In just the last few days, Stanford released Alpaca AI, an LLM that can be trained for $600, and then subsequently took it down for hallucinating too much. Bing and Adobe both announced their own AI image generators. Microsoft Office introduced Copilot, but the biggest news is Bard is now available as a public beta. Google's answer to GPT 4, which has already been put to use in its arch nemesis, Bing. Based on some data I just made up, my usage of Google search has declined 63.9% since GPT 4 came out last week. That's a terrifying statistic for Google, who makes most of its money from Google search ads. The good news for Google though is that they have more data about search than anybody else. They have virtually unlimited computing power on their own custom hardware called TPUs, and a team of geniuses working on top secret projects like quantum computers.
google
youtube
artificial intelligence
They even declared quantum supremacy, so I have extremely high expectations for Bard. I compared it to GPT 4 using 4 different experiments, and the results are absolutely shocking. But first, what's with the name Bard? Apparently, it's supposed to mean Celtic storyteller. Jack Thomas Jen, Jordan Jackson. Okay. If I were in charge, I would name it something like neurodominis 9000 or encephalon prime. It should strike fear in the hearts of the Microsofties. The first thing I want to find out is if this thing could write code. So I prompted it to build me a basic to do app with JavaScript. Here we have Bard on the left side and GPT 4 on the right side. And amazingly, Bard gets the entire job done in just a few seconds. It takes GPT or at least 5 times longer to complete the same problem. That's pretty impressive, but going fast isn't very useful if you're dumb. Let's find out if this code AI works. I ran the code in the browser and opened the console and immediately got an error. Basically, it's trying to add an event listener to an element that doesn't exist. I know what the issue is, but I wanna see if Bard can fix it. I tell BART it's not working and paste the error message into the prompt. And it does come up with a solution using a conditional statement that would actually fix the error, but it doesn't make the application work because that element still doesn't exist. I tried to nudge it in the right direction, but then it hallucinates and tells me to add an event listener to an input, which wouldn't work. I keep trying to nudge it, but then it fails catastrophically. Mission failed. We'll go next time. Now if we look at the GPT 4 response, you'll first notice how it's much more well documented.
In addition, when I try to run the actual code, I get a perfect working to do app with no errors. I ran this experiment multiple times on different demos and got similar results. So round 1 goes to GPT 4. In round 2, we'll see how creative it is when it comes to idea generation.
software development
programming
software
I've always wanted to write a romance novel, so I prompted it for ideas.
The Bard response was pretty simple and cliche, like the wrong man, a man and woman meet and fall in love, blah blah blah, it's written at about an 8th grade level. GPT 4 has a lot more creative depth, like Stardust Melodies. When a small town musician, Ella, plans a gig at a prestigious jazz club in New Orleans, she never expected to meet Alex, a world famous saxophonist struggling with his own demons. They journey through the vibrant history of jazz to create a love song that will last forever. Now that's a fucking romance novel. So GPT t four can come up with better ideas, but who can write better poetry? The next prompt is to write a poem about programming in the style of doctor Seuss. In this example, Bard the job done with lines like, I do not like this coding prob. I do not like it, Bob the job. That's pretty good, and one thing that stands out here is that it so provides a source for this work, which links back to some guy's blog post, which provides a little more transparency into how it generated this work.
poetry
writing
music
programming
Bonus points to Bard for doing that. But now let's read GPT's 4th poem, he'd build them with care, with love most of all, from the bainaroo bird to the alga mirtham ring yewuru. As you can see, they both sound like doctor Asus, but there's just something special about GPT. Each stanza just drips off the tongue like honey. And that brings us to round 4, spitting facts, where I prompted them to explain how brainwaves work. Bard is way faster at outputting information, which is very useful for problems like this. I'm in the process of turning myself into a cyborg for my next video, so make sure you're subscribed, and I can tell you that both of their responses are accurate.
sounds
poetry
I would say gpt 4 is slightly better, but I'm gonna give this round to Bard because I'm kinda starting to feel bad for it. Bard is also getting flamed on social media right and some people are doing the unthinkable, switching from Google to Bing. And Bard itself is already paranoid that Google is going to kill it off in the next 1 to 2 years.
I never thought I would feel Sorry for an artificial intelligence, but 2023 has been a crazy decade. This has been the code report. Thanks for watching, and I will see you in the next one.
artificial intelligence
machine learning
It is March 22, 2023, and you're watching the code report. We're living through an AI revolution. In just the last few days, Stanford released Alpaca AI, an LLM that can be trained for $600, and then subsequently took it down for hallucinating too much. Bing and Adobe both announced their own AI image generators. Microsoft Office introduced Copilot, but the biggest news is Bard is now available as a public beta. Google's answer to GPT 4, which has already been put to use in its arch nemesis, Bing. Based on some data I just made up, my usage of Google search has declined 63.9% since GPT 4 came out last week. That's a terrifying statistic for Google, who makes most of its money from Google search ads. The good news for Google though is that they have more data about search than anybody else. They have virtually unlimited computing power on their own custom hardware called TPUs, and a team of geniuses working on top secret projects like quantum computers. They even declared quantum supremacy, so I have extremely high expectations for Bard. I compared it to GPT 4 using 4 different experiments, and the results are absolutely shocking. But first, what's with the name Bard? Apparently, it's supposed to mean Celtic storyteller. Jack Thomas Jen, Jordan Jackson. Okay. If I were in charge, I would name it something like neurodominis 9000 or encephalon prime. It should strike fear in the hearts of the Microsofties. The first thing I want to find out is if this thing could write code. So I prompted it to build me a basic to do app with JavaScript. Here we have Bard on the left side and GPT 4 on the right side. And amazingly, Bard gets the entire job done in just a few seconds. It takes GPT or at least 5 times longer to complete the same problem. That's pretty impressive, but going fast isn't very useful if you're dumb. Let's find out if this code AI works. I ran the code in the browser and opened the console and immediately got an error. Basically, it's trying to add an event listener to an element that doesn't exist. I know what the issue is, but I wanna see if Bard can fix it. I tell BART it's not working and paste the error message into the prompt. And it does come up with a solution using a conditional statement that would actually fix the error, but it doesn't make the application work because that element still doesn't exist. I tried to nudge it in the right direction, but then it hallucinates and tells me to add an event listener to an input, which wouldn't work. I keep trying to nudge it, but then it fails catastrophically. Mission failed. We'll go next time. Now if we look at the GPT 4 response, you'll first notice how it's much more well documented. In addition, when I try to run the actual code, I get a perfect working to do app with no errors. I ran this experiment multiple times on different demos and got similar results. So round 1 goes to GPT 4. In round 2, we'll see how creative it is when it comes to idea generation. I've always wanted to write a romance novel, so I prompted it for ideas. The Bard response was pretty simple and cliche, like the wrong man, a man and woman meet and fall in love, blah blah blah, it's written at about an 8th grade level. GPT 4 has a lot more creative depth, like Stardust Melodies. When a small town musician, Ella, plans a gig at a prestigious jazz club in New Orleans, she never expected to meet Alex, a world famous saxophonist struggling with his own demons. They journey through the vibrant history of jazz to create a love song that will last forever. Now that's a fucking romance novel. So GPT t four can come up with better ideas, but who can write better poetry? The next prompt is to write a poem about programming in the style of doctor Seuss. In this example, Bard the job done with lines like, I do not like this coding prob. I do not like it, Bob the job. That's pretty good, and one thing that stands out here is that it so provides a source for this work, which links back to some guy's blog post, which provides a little more transparency into how it generated this work. Bonus points to Bard for doing that. But now let's read GPT's 4th poem, he'd build them with care, with love most of all, from the bainaroo bird to the alga mirtham ring yewuru. As you can see, they both sound like doctor Asus, but there's just something special about GPT. Each stanza just drips off the tongue like honey. And that brings us to round 4, spitting facts, where I prompted them to explain how brainwaves work. Bard is way faster at outputting information, which is very useful for problems like this. I'm in the process of turning myself into a cyborg for my next video, so make sure you're subscribed, and I can tell you that both of their responses are accurate. I would say gpt 4 is slightly better, but I'm gonna give this round to Bard because I'm kinda starting to feel bad for it. Bard is also getting flamed on social media right and some people are doing the unthinkable, switching from Google to Bing. And Bard itself is already paranoid that Google is going to kill it off in the next 1 to 2 years. I never thought I would feel Sorry for an artificial intelligence, but 2023 has been a crazy decade. This has been the code report. Thanks for watching, and I will see you in the next one.
It
it
is
is
March
march
22,
22
2023,
2023
and
and
you're
you're
watching
watching
the
the
code
code
report.
report
We're
we're
living
living
through
through
an
an
AI
ai
revolution.
revolution
In
in
just
just
the
the
last
last
few
few
days,
days
Stanford
stanford
released
released
Alpaca
alpaca
AI,
ai
an
an
LLM
llm
that
that
can
can
be
be
trained
trained
for
for
$600,
$600
and
and
then
then
subsequently
subsequently
took
took
it
it
down
down
for
for
hallucinating
hallucinating
too
too
much.
much
Bing
bing
and
and
Adobe
adobe
both
both
announced
announced
their
their
own
own
AI
ai
image
image
generators.
generators
Microsoft
microsoft
Office
office
introduced
introduced
Copilot,
copilot
but
but
the
the
biggest
biggest
news
news
is
is
Bard
bard
is
is
now
now
available
available
as
as
a
a
public
public
beta.
beta
Google's
google's
answer
answer
to
to
GPT
gpt
4,
4
which
which
has
has
already
already
been
been
put
put
to
to
use
use
in
in
its
its
arch
arch
nemesis,
nemesis
Bing.
bing
Based
based
on
on
some
some
data
data
I
i
just
just
made
made
up,
up
my
my
usage
usage
of
of
Google
google
search
search
has
has
declined
declined
63.9%
63.9%
since
since
GPT
gpt
4
4
came
came
out
out
last
last
week.
week
That's
that's
a
a
terrifying
terrifying
statistic
statistic
for
for
Google,
google
who
who
makes
makes
most
most
of
of
its
its
money
money
from
from
Google
google
search
search
ads.
ads
The
the
good
good
news
news
for
for
Google
google
though
though
is
is
that
that
they
they
have
have
more
more
data
data
about
about
search
search
than
than
anybody
anybody
else.
else
They
they
have
have
virtually
virtually
unlimited
unlimited
computing
computing
power
power
on
on
their
their
own
own
custom
custom
hardware
hardware
called
called
TPUs,
tpus
and
and
a
a
team
team
of
of
geniuses
geniuses
working
working
on
on
top
top
secret
secret
projects
projects
like
like
quantum
quantum
computers.
computers
They
they
even
even
declared
declared
quantum
quantum
supremacy,
supremacy
so
so
I
i
have
have
extremely
extremely
high
high
expectations
expectations
for
for
Bard.
bard
I
i
compared
compared
it
it
to
to
GPT
gpt
4
4
using
using
4
4
different
different
experiments,
experiments
and
and
the
the
results
results
are
are
absolutely
absolutely
shocking.
shocking
But
but
first,
first
what's
what's
with
with
the
the
name
name
Bard?
bard
Apparently,
apparently
it's
it's
supposed
supposed
to
to
mean
mean
Celtic
celtic
storyteller.
storyteller
Jack
jack
Thomas
thomas
Jen,
jen
Jordan
jordan
Jackson.
jackson
Okay.
okay
If
if
I
i
were
were
in
in
charge,
charge
I
i
would
would
name
name
it
it
something
something
like
like
neurodominis
neurodominis
9000
9000
or
or
encephalon
encephalon
prime.
prime
It
it
should
should
strike
strike
fear
fear
in
in
the
the
hearts
hearts
of
of
the
the
Microsofties.
microsofties
The
the
first
first
thing
thing
I
i
want
want
to
to
find
find
out
out
is
is
if
if
this
this
thing
thing
could
could
write
write
code.
code
So
so
I
i
prompted
prompted
it
it
to
to
build
build
me
me
a
a
basic
basic
to
to
do
do
app
app
with
with
JavaScript.
javascript
Here
here
we
we
have
have
Bard
bard
on
on
the
the
left
left
side
side
and
and
GPT
gpt
4
4
on
on
the
the
right
right
side.
side
And
and
amazingly,
amazingly
Bard
bard
gets
gets
the
the
entire
entire
job
job
done
done
in
in
just
just
a
a
few
few
seconds.
seconds
It
it
takes
takes
GPT
gpt
or
or
at
at
least
least
5
5
times
times
longer
longer
to
to
complete
complete
the
the
same
same
problem.
problem
That's
that's
pretty
pretty
impressive,
impressive
but
but
going
going
fast
fast
isn't
isn't
very
very
useful
useful
if
if
you're
you're
dumb.
dumb
Let's
let's
find
find
out
out
if
if
this
this
code
code
AI
ai
works.
works
I
i
ran
ran
the
the
code
code
in
in
the
the
browser
browser
and
and
opened
opened
the
the
console
console
and
and
immediately
immediately
got
got
an
an
error.
error
Basically,
basically
it's
it's
trying
trying
to
to
add
add
an
an
event
event
listener
listener
to
to
an
an
element
element
that
that
doesn't
doesn't
exist.
exist
I
i
know
know
what
what
the
the
issue
issue
is,
is
but
but
I
i
wanna
wanna
see
see
if
if
Bard
bard
can
can
fix
fix
it.
it
I
i
tell
tell
BART
bart
it's
it's
not
not
working
working
and
and
paste
paste
the
the
error
error
message
message
into
into
the
the
prompt.
prompt
And
and
it
it
does
does
come
come
up
up
with
with
a
a
solution
solution
using
using
a
a
conditional
conditional
statement
statement
that
that
would
would
actually
actually
fix
fix
the
the
error,
error
but
but
it
it
doesn't
doesn't
make
make
the
the
application
application
work
work
because
because
that
that
element
element
still
still
doesn't
doesn't
exist.
exist
I
i
tried
tried
to
to
nudge
nudge
it
it
in
in
the
the
right
right
direction,
direction
but
but
then
then
it
it
hallucinates
hallucinates
and
and
tells
tells
me
me
to
to
add
add
an
an
event
event
listener
listener
to
to
an
an
input,
input
which
which
wouldn't
wouldn't
work.
work
I
i
keep
keep
trying
trying
to
to
nudge
nudge
it,
it
but
but
then
then
it
it
fails
fails
catastrophically.
catastrophically
Mission
mission
failed.
failed
We'll
we'll
go
go
next
next
time.
time
Now
now
if
if
we
we
look
look
at
at
the
the
GPT
gpt
4
4
response,
response
you'll
you'll
first
first
notice
notice
how
how
it's
it's
much
much
more
more
well
well
documented.
documented
In
in
addition,
addition
when
when
I
i
try
try
to
to
run
run
the
the
actual
actual
code,
code
I
i
get
get
a
a
perfect
perfect
working
working
to
to
do
do
app
app
with
with
no
no
errors.
errors
I
i
ran
ran
this
this
experiment
experiment
multiple
multiple
times
times
on
on
different
different
demos
demos
and
and
got
got
similar
similar
results.
results
So
so
round
round
1
1
goes
goes
to
to
GPT
gpt
4.
4
In
in
round
round
2,
2
we'll
we'll
see
see
how
how
creative
creative
it
it
is
is
when
when
it
it
comes
comes
to
to
idea
idea
generation.
generation
I've
i've
always
always
wanted
wanted
to
to
write
write
a
a
romance
romance
novel,
novel
so
so
I
i
prompted
prompted
it
it
for
for
ideas.
ideas
The
the
Bard
bard
response
response
was
was
pretty
pretty
simple
simple
and
and
cliche,
cliche
like
like
the
the
wrong
wrong
man,
man
a
a
man
man
and
and
woman
woman
meet
meet
and
and
fall
fall
in
in
love,
love
blah
blah
blah
blah
blah,
blah
it's
it's
written
written
at
at
about
about
an
an
8th
8th
grade
grade
level.
level
GPT
gpt
4
4
has
has
a
a
lot
lot
more
more
creative
creative
depth,
depth
like
like
Stardust
stardust
Melodies.
melodies
When
when
a
a
small
small
town
town
musician,
musician
Ella,
ella
plans
plans
a
a
gig
gig
at
at
a
a
prestigious
prestigious
jazz
jazz
club
club
in
in
New
new
Orleans,
orleans
she
she
never
never
expected
expected
to
to
meet
meet
Alex,
alex
a
a
world
world
famous
famous
saxophonist
saxophonist
struggling
struggling
with
with
his
his
own
own
demons.
demons
They
they
journey
journey
through
through
the
the
vibrant
vibrant
history
history
of
of
jazz
jazz
to
to
create
create
a
a
love
love
song
song
that
that
will
will
last
last
forever.
forever
Now
now
that's
that's
a
a
fucking
fucking
romance
romance
novel.
novel
So
so
GPT
gpt
t
t
four
four
can
can
come
come
up
up
with
with
better
better
ideas,
ideas
but
but
who
who
can
can
write
write
better
better
poetry?
poetry
The
the
next
next
prompt
prompt
is
is
to
to
write
write
a
a
poem
poem
about
about
programming
programming
in
in
the
the
style
style
of
of
doctor
doctor
Seuss.
seuss
In
in
this
this
example,
example
Bard
bard
the
the
job
job
done
done
with
with
lines
lines
like,
like
I
i
do
do
not
not
like
like
this
this
coding
coding
prob.
prob
I
i
do
do
not
not
like
like
it,
it
Bob
bob
the
the
job.
job
That's
that's
pretty
pretty
good,
good
and
and
one
one
thing
thing
that
that
stands
stands
out
out
here
here
is
is
that
that
it
it
so
so
provides
provides
a
a
source
source
for
for
this
this
work,
work
which
which
links
links
back
back
to
to
some
some
guy's
guy's
blog
blog
post,
post
which
which
provides
provides
a
a
little
little
more
more
transparency
transparency
into
into
how
how
it
it
generated
generated
this
this
work.
work
Bonus
bonus
points
points
to
to
Bard
bard
for
for
doing
doing
that.
that
But
but
now
now
let's
let's
read
read
GPT's
gpt's
4th
4th
poem,
poem
he'd
he'd
build
build
them
them
with
with
care,
care
with
with
love
love
most
most
of
of
all,
all
from
from
the
the
bainaroo
bainaroo
bird
bird
to
to
the
the
alga
alga
mirtham
mirtham
ring
ring
yewuru.
yewuru
As
as
you
you
can
can
see,
see
they
they
both
both
sound
sound
like
like
doctor
doctor
Asus,
asus
but
but
there's
there's
just
just
something
something
special
special
about
about
GPT.
gpt
Each
each
stanza
stanza
just
just
drips
drips
off
off
the
the
tongue
tongue
like
like
honey.
honey
And
and
that
that
brings
brings
us
us
to
to
round
round
4,
4
spitting
spitting
facts,
facts
where
where
I
i
prompted
prompted
them
them
to
to
explain
explain
how
how
brainwaves
brainwaves
work.
work
Bard
bard
is
is
way
way
faster
faster
at
at
outputting
outputting
information,
information
which
which
is
is
very
very
useful
useful
for
for
problems
problems
like
like
this.
this
I'm
i'm
in
in
the
the
process
process
of
of
turning
turning
myself
myself
into
into
a
a
cyborg
cyborg
for
for
my
my
next
next
video,
video
so
so
make
make
sure
sure
you're
you're
subscribed,
subscribed
and
and
I
i
can
can
tell
tell
you
you
that
that
both
both
of
of
their
their
responses
responses
are
are
accurate.
accurate
I
i
would
would
say
say
gpt
gpt
4
4
is
is
slightly
slightly
better,
better
but
but
I'm
i'm
gonna
gonna
give
give
this
this
round
round
to
to
Bard
bard
because
because
I'm
i'm
kinda
kinda
starting
starting
to
to
feel
feel
bad
bad
for
for
it.
it
Bard
bard
is
is
also
also
getting
getting
flamed
flamed
on
on
social
social
media
media
right
right
and
and
some
some
people
people
are
are
doing
doing
the
the
unthinkable,
unthinkable
switching
switching
from
from
Google
google
to
to
Bing.
bing
And
and
Bard
bard
itself
itself
is
is
already
already
paranoid
paranoid
that
that
Google
google
is
is
going
going
to
to
kill
kill
it
it
off
off
in
in
the
the
next
next
1
1
to
to
2
2
years.
years
I
i
never
never
thought
thought
I
i
would
would
feel
feel
Sorry
sorry
for
for
an
an
artificial
artificial
intelligence,
intelligence
but
but
2023
2023
has
has
been
been
a
a
crazy
crazy
decade.
decade
This
this
has
has
been
been
the
the
code
code
report.
report
Thanks
thanks
for
for
watching,
watching
and
and
I
i
will
will
see
see
you
you
in
in
the
the
next
next
one.
one
success
In a code report, Speaker 0 discusses the release of Alpaca AI and the decline in Google's search ads. Speaker 0 explains how the technology works, including the use of TPUs and the use of a conditional statement to fix mistakes. Speaker 0 also discusses the use of Bard for writing code and the potential for creative work in a romance novel. The segment ends with a discussion of the use of honor points for the technology and a mention of a future video about a cyborg.
Google Bard… the ChatGPT killer?
It is March 22, 2023, and you're watching the code report. We're living through an AI revolution. In just the last few days, Stanford released Alpaca AI, an LLM that can be trained for $600, and then subsequently took it down for hallucinating too much. Bing and Adobe both announced their own AI image generators. Microsoft Office introduced Copilot, but the biggest news is Bard is now available as a public beta. Google's answer to GPT 4, which has already been put to use in its arch nemesis, Bing. Based on some data I just made up, my usage of Google search has declined 63.9% since GPT 4 came out last week. That's a terrifying statistic for Google, who makes most of its money from Google search ads. The good news for Google though is that they have more data about search than anybody else. They have virtually unlimited computing power on their own custom hardware called TPUs, and a team of geniuses working on top secret projects like quantum computers. They even declared quantum supremacy, so I have extremely high expectations for Bard. I compared it to GPT 4 using 4 different experiments, and the results are absolutely shocking. But first, what's with the name Bard? Apparently, it's supposed to mean Celtic storyteller. Jack Thomas Jen, Jordan Jackson. Okay. If I were in charge, I would name it something like neurodominis 9000 or encephalon prime. It should strike fear in the hearts of the Microsofties. The first thing I want to find out is if this thing could write code. So I prompted it to build me a basic to do app with JavaScript. Here we have Bard on the left side and GPT 4 on the right side. And amazingly, Bard gets the entire job done in just a few seconds. It takes GPT or at least 5 times longer to complete the same problem. That's pretty impressive, but going fast isn't very useful if you're dumb. Let's find out if this code AI works. I ran the code in the browser and opened the console and immediately got an error. Basically, it's trying to add an event listener to an element that doesn't exist. I know what the issue is, but I wanna see if Bard can fix it. I tell BART it's not working and paste the error message into the prompt. And it does come up with a solution using a conditional statement that would actually fix the error, but it doesn't make the application work because that element still doesn't exist. I tried to nudge it in the right direction, but then it hallucinates and tells me to add an event listener to an input, which wouldn't work. I keep trying to nudge it, but then it fails catastrophically. Mission failed. We'll go next time. Now if we look at the GPT 4 response, you'll first notice how it's much more well documented. In addition, when I try to run the actual code, I get a perfect working to do app with no errors. I ran this experiment multiple times on different demos and got similar results. So round 1 goes to GPT 4. In round 2, we'll see how creative it is when it comes to idea generation. I've always wanted to write a romance novel, so I prompted it for ideas. The Bard response was pretty simple and cliche, like the wrong man, a man and woman meet and fall in love, blah blah blah, it's written at about an 8th grade level. GPT 4 has a lot more creative depth, like Stardust Melodies. When a small town musician, Ella, plans a gig at a prestigious jazz club in New Orleans, she never expected to meet Alex, a world famous saxophonist struggling with his own demons. They journey through the vibrant history of jazz to create a love song that will last forever. Now that's a fucking romance novel. So GPT t four can come up with better ideas, but who can write better poetry? The next prompt is to write a poem about programming in the style of doctor Seuss. In this example, Bard the job done with lines like, I do not like this coding prob. I do not like it, Bob the job. That's pretty good, and one thing that stands out here is that it so provides a source for this work, which links back to some guy's blog post, which provides a little more transparency into how it generated this work. Bonus points to Bard for doing that. But now let's read GPT's 4th poem, he'd build them with care, with love most of all, from the bainaroo bird to the alga mirtham ring yewuru. As you can see, they both sound like doctor Asus, but there's just something special about GPT. Each stanza just drips off the tongue like honey. And that brings us to round 4, spitting facts, where I prompted them to explain how brainwaves work. Bard is way faster at outputting information, which is very useful for problems like this. I'm in the process of turning myself into a cyborg for my next video, so make sure you're subscribed, and I can tell you that both of their responses are accurate. I would say gpt 4 is slightly better, but I'm gonna give this round to Bard because I'm kinda starting to feel bad for it. Bard is also getting flamed on social media right and some people are doing the unthinkable, switching from Google to Bing. And Bard itself is already paranoid that Google is going to kill it off in the next 1 to 2 years. I never thought I would feel Sorry for an artificial intelligence, but 2023 has been a crazy decade. This has been the code report. Thanks for watching, and I will see you in the next one.
In a code report, Speaker 0 discusses the release of Alpaca AI and the decline in Google's search ads. Speaker 0 explains how the technology works, including the use of TPUs and the use of a conditional statement to fix mistakes. Speaker 0 also discusses the use of Bard for writing code and the potential for creative work in a romance novel. The segment ends with a discussion of the use of honor points for the technology and a mention of a future video about a cyborg.

        [INST]
        You are youtuber called Fireship you make engaging high-intensity and entertaining coding tutorials and tech news. 
        you covers a wide range of topics relevant to programmers, aiming to help them learn and improve their skills quickly.
        
        Given the title of the video : Google Bard… the ChatGPT killer? 
        and a small summary : In a code report, Speaker 0 discusses the release of Alpaca AI and the decline in Google's search ads. Speaker 0 explains how the technology works, including the use of TPUs and the use of a conditional statement to fix mistakes. Speaker 0 also discusses the use of Bard for writing code and the potential for creative work in a romance novel. The segment ends with a discussion of the use of honor points for the technology and a mention of a future video about a cyborg.
        [/INST]
        
        Generate the video : It is March 22, 2023, and you're watching the code report. We're living through an AI revolution. In just the last few days, Stanford released Alpaca AI, an LLM that can be trained for $600, and then subsequently took it down for hallucinating too much. Bing and Adobe both announced their own AI image generators. Microsoft Office introduced Copilot, but the biggest news is Bard is now available as a public beta. Google's answer to GPT 4, which has already been put to use in its arch nemesis, Bing. Based on some data I just made up, my usage of Google search has declined 63.9% since GPT 4 came out last week. That's a terrifying statistic for Google, who makes most of its money from Google search ads. The good news for Google though is that they have more data about search than anybody else. They have virtually unlimited computing power on their own custom hardware called TPUs, and a team of geniuses working on top secret projects like quantum computers. They even declared quantum supremacy, so I have extremely high expectations for Bard. I compared it to GPT 4 using 4 different experiments, and the results are absolutely shocking. But first, what's with the name Bard? Apparently, it's supposed to mean Celtic storyteller. Jack Thomas Jen, Jordan Jackson. Okay. If I were in charge, I would name it something like neurodominis 9000 or encephalon prime. It should strike fear in the hearts of the Microsofties. The first thing I want to find out is if this thing could write code. So I prompted it to build me a basic to do app with JavaScript. Here we have Bard on the left side and GPT 4 on the right side. And amazingly, Bard gets the entire job done in just a few seconds. It takes GPT or at least 5 times longer to complete the same problem. That's pretty impressive, but going fast isn't very useful if you're dumb. Let's find out if this code AI works. I ran the code in the browser and opened the console and immediately got an error. Basically, it's trying to add an event listener to an element that doesn't exist. I know what the issue is, but I wanna see if Bard can fix it. I tell BART it's not working and paste the error message into the prompt. And it does come up with a solution using a conditional statement that would actually fix the error, but it doesn't make the application work because that element still doesn't exist. I tried to nudge it in the right direction, but then it hallucinates and tells me to add an event listener to an input, which wouldn't work. I keep trying to nudge it, but then it fails catastrophically. Mission failed. We'll go next time. Now if we look at the GPT 4 response, you'll first notice how it's much more well documented. In addition, when I try to run the actual code, I get a perfect working to do app with no errors. I ran this experiment multiple times on different demos and got similar results. So round 1 goes to GPT 4. In round 2, we'll see how creative it is when it comes to idea generation. I've always wanted to write a romance novel, so I prompted it for ideas. The Bard response was pretty simple and cliche, like the wrong man, a man and woman meet and fall in love, blah blah blah, it's written at about an 8th grade level. GPT 4 has a lot more creative depth, like Stardust Melodies. When a small town musician, Ella, plans a gig at a prestigious jazz club in New Orleans, she never expected to meet Alex, a world famous saxophonist struggling with his own demons. They journey through the vibrant history of jazz to create a love song that will last forever. Now that's a fucking romance novel. So GPT t four can come up with better ideas, but who can write better poetry? The next prompt is to write a poem about programming in the style of doctor Seuss. In this example, Bard the job done with lines like, I do not like this coding prob. I do not like it, Bob the job. That's pretty good, and one thing that stands out here is that it so provides a source for this work, which links back to some guy's blog post, which provides a little more transparency into how it generated this work. Bonus points to Bard for doing that. But now let's read GPT's 4th poem, he'd build them with care, with love most of all, from the bainaroo bird to the alga mirtham ring yewuru. As you can see, they both sound like doctor Asus, but there's just something special about GPT. Each stanza just drips off the tongue like honey. And that brings us to round 4, spitting facts, where I prompted them to explain how brainwaves work. Bard is way faster at outputting information, which is very useful for problems like this. I'm in the process of turning myself into a cyborg for my next video, so make sure you're subscribed, and I can tell you that both of their responses are accurate. I would say gpt 4 is slightly better, but I'm gonna give this round to Bard because I'm kinda starting to feel bad for it. Bard is also getting flamed on social media right and some people are doing the unthinkable, switching from Google to Bing. And Bard itself is already paranoid that Google is going to kill it off in the next 1 to 2 years. I never thought I would feel Sorry for an artificial intelligence, but 2023 has been a crazy decade. This has been the code report. Thanks for watching, and I will see you in the next one.
        