Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ base_model_relation: merge
|
|
28 |
|
29 |
# Vintage Vintage
|
30 |
|
31 |
-
The Vintage LoRA baked into a merge of the Vintage model and StaticMVintage (so the model should have been named VintageVintageVintage, but I kept a spare one!) to... well, to what else? Samples and prompts (all use seed 9119):
|
32 |
|
33 |

|
34 |
|
@@ -106,4 +106,20 @@ Model A: VintagePlusStaticM
|
|
106 |
|
107 |
Model B: StaticMPlusVintage
|
108 |
|
109 |
-
Output Model: VintageVintage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
29 |
# Vintage Vintage
|
30 |
|
31 |
+
The Vintage LoRA baked into a merge of the Vintage model (which includes the Film model (which includes FilmGirlUltra) and the Vintedois model) and StaticMVintage (so the model should have been named VintageVintageVintage, but I kept a spare one!) to... well, to what else? Samples and prompts (all use seed 9119):
|
32 |
|
33 |

|
34 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
107 |
Model B: StaticMPlusVintage
|
108 |
|
109 |
+
Output Model: VintageVintage
|
110 |
+
|
111 |
+
# Merge Block Weight Analysis
|
112 |
+
|
113 |
+
If each corresponding block was labeled as this:
|
114 |
+
|
115 |
+
V = Vintedois
|
116 |
+
|
117 |
+
F = Film
|
118 |
+
|
119 |
+
0 = VintagePlusStaticM
|
120 |
+
|
121 |
+
1 = StaticMPlusVintage
|
122 |
+
|
123 |
+
Then the weights of the model would read like this:
|
124 |
+
|
125 |
+
1,V,V,V,V,V,V,F,F,F,0,0,0,V,0,0,0,0,0,0,F,F,F,0,0,0
|