Tonic commited on
Commit
117660f
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): c25c127

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +16 -5
README.md CHANGED
@@ -44,17 +44,28 @@ It achieves the following results on the evaluation set:
44
 
45
  ## Model description
46
 
47
- More information needed
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
48
 
49
  ## Intended uses & limitations
50
 
51
- More information needed
52
 
53
  ## Training and evaluation data
54
 
55
- More information needed
56
-
57
- ## Training procedure
58
 
59
  ### Training hyperparameters
60
 
 
44
 
45
  ## Model description
46
 
47
+ This model implements a novel approach to classifying climate change skepticism arguments
48
+ by utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) for synthetic data. The base architecture uses ModernBERT with
49
+ only synthetic data used for training. The model achieves exceptional performance with an accuracy of 99.45% on the validation dataset which is therefore the [QuotaClimat](QuotaClimat/frugalaichallenge-text-train) dataset.
50
+
51
+ The model categorizes text into the following skepticism types:
52
+
53
+ - `label`: Following categories:
54
+ - `0_not_relevant`: No relevant claim detected or claims that don't fit other categories
55
+ - `1_not_happening`: Claims denying the occurrence of global warming and its effects - Global warming is not happening. Climate change is NOT leading to melting ice (such as glaciers, sea ice, and permafrost), increased extreme weather, or rising sea levels. Cold weather also shows that climate change is not happening
56
+ - `2_not_human`: Claims denying human responsibility in climate change - Greenhouse gases from humans are not the causing climate change.
57
+ - `3_not_bad`: Claims minimizing or denying negative impacts of climate change - The impacts of climate change will not be bad and might even be beneficial.
58
+ - `4_solutions_harmful_unnecessary`: Claims against climate solutions - Climate solutions are harmful or unnecessary
59
+ - `5_science_is_unreliable`: Claims questioning climate science validity - Climate science is uncertain, unsound, unreliable, or biased.
60
+ - `6_proponents_biased`: Claims attacking climate scientists and activists - Climate scientists and proponents of climate action are alarmist, biased, wrong, hypocritical, corrupt, and/or politically motivated.
61
+ - `7_fossil_fuels_needed`: Claims promoting fossil fuel necessity - We need fossil fuels for economic growth, prosperity, and to maintain our standard of living.
62
 
63
  ## Intended uses & limitations
64
 
65
+ This model can be used for multi-class text classification tasks where the input text needs to be categorized into one of the eight predefined classes. It is particularly suited for datasets with class imbalance, thanks to its weighted loss function.
66
 
67
  ## Training and evaluation data
68
 
 
 
 
69
 
70
  ### Training hyperparameters
71