<|im_start|>user
Answer the following question: Here is a review left by a customer on a product. Would you say he was satisfied or dissatisfied? Title: Faulty HDCD on Audio Fidelity CD Review: You would think paying double the price of the stock CD would mean high quality, right? You'd be wrong. The Audio Fidelity release of this CD is a huge ripoff - unfortunately, I didn't learn of this until after I purchased and played the CD.The HDCD encoding is faulty, resulting in both of my HDCD players switching back and forth between HDCD and no HDCD during some tracks.Also, the artwork and liner notes on this version are horrendous!Audio Fidelity is quickly becoming the Bose of audiophile CDs: all marketing and no quality. They should spend less money touting their 'Kensei Audio Transformer', whatever that is, and more into QA.Sincerely,A Disappointed ListenerUpdate: as posted elsewhere, there are gaps between tracks that were not present on the original album. So I bought a bastardized "audiophile" version of the original, and I paid through the nose for it. Thumbs down!!!
Answer:<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant

The customer was dissatisfied.<|im_end|>

 Based on the review, the customer was dissatisfied with the product. The reviewer states that the HDCD encoding is faulty, causing issues with their HDCD players, and the artwork and liner notes are of poor quality. Additionally, they mention that the company is "all marketing and no quality" and that they should spend more on quality assurance. The reviewer concludes by giving the product a thumbs down. Overall, the review expresses a negative experience with the product and the company.<|im_end|>
