Update README.md

README.md

@@ -130,4 +130,7 @@ Output CREATIVE:
 (Grammarly Score: 83)
 
 # Conclusion
-The model works reasonably well, with occasional (and often debatable) grammar misses. The limitations seem to be related to the 7B parameters. It appears that the size is not sufficient to have a fine-grained understanding of various nuances of the text. This correlates with my other findings - the Mistral model performs quite well when generating its own text, but its comprehension is less than perfect, again related to be onbly 7B parameters.
+
+After probably 10 different versions with subsequent changes, I can now say that the current model works reasonably well, with occasional (but often debatable) grammar misses. The limitations seem to be related to the 7B parameters. It appears that the size isn't sufficient to have a fine-grained understanding of various nuances of the input. This correlates with my other findings - the Mistral model performs quite well when generating its own text, but its comprehension is less than perfect, again related to only 7B parameters.
+
+The goal was to create a model that wouldn't change the style of the text. Often, LLM models, when asked to edit text, will attempt to rewrite the text even if the text is already fine. This proved to be quite challenging for such a small model where the main task was to determine the right balance between fixing the text (and not changing it's style) and copying it verbatim.